-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding check for the raw calculation to see if lammps has exited with an error #90
Adding check for the raw calculation to see if lammps has exited with an error #90
Conversation
… an error. Addresses aiidaplugins#87
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #90 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 85.30% 85.86% +0.56%
===========================================
Files 19 19
Lines 1599 1606 +7
===========================================
+ Hits 1364 1379 +15
+ Misses 235 227 -8
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good, thanks @JPchico . Would be great if you could add a quick test. Does one already exist for the other parser?
Hi @sphuber! No there is no test for this, so I'll add one for both parsers. |
@sphuber tests added. If you agree I'll merge this one. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @JPchico good to go
Adding check for the raw calculation to see if lammps has exited with an error. Addresses #87