[CLIENT-2196] Add missing batch policies to client config

[juliannguyen4]

Docs: https://aerospike-python-client--495.org.readthedocs.build/en/495/aerospike.html#client-configuration

Build wheels: https://github.com/aerospike/aerospike-client-python/actions/runs/5969042908

Valgrind

Stage branch: https://github.com/aerospike/aerospike-client-python/actions/runs/5969045150/job/16194118766
This branch: https://github.com/aerospike/aerospike-client-python/actions/runs/5969044645

jnguyen@as-PF3WN8Y6:~/aerospike/aerospike-client-python$ diff <(grep Aerospike stage.log | awk '{print $5}' | sort) <(grep Aerospike 'CLIENT-2196.log' | awk '{print $5}' | sort)
26,28d25
< AerospikeClient_Append
< AerospikeClient_Append
< AerospikeClient_Append
80c77
< AerospikeClient_Operate
---
> AerospikeClient_New
129a127
> AerospikeClient_Type_Init
212a211
> AerospikeException_New
225a225
> AerospikeQuery_Get_Partitions_status
233d232
< AerospikeScan_Get_Partitions_status

AerospikeClient_New:
Stage:
4 raise_exception
4 add_host

This branch:
5 raise_exception
4 add_host

Extra raise_exception leak caused by negative tests being added in this PR.

AerospikeClient_Type_Init (from same stack as AerospikeClient_New leaks)

AerospikeQuery_Get_Partitions_status doesn't seem related to this PR

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 91.78% and project coverage change: +0.05% 🎉

Comparison is base (961119b) 81.27% compared to head (681da59) 81.33%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            stage     #495      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.27%   81.33%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          98       98              
  Lines       14645    14717      +72     
==========================================
+ Hits        11903    11970      +67     
- Misses       2742     2747       +5     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/main/policy_config.c	90.24% <91.78%> (+0.68%)	⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[dwelch-spike]

I think you should note that the client level policies do not accept expressions in the docs at https://aerospike-python-client.readthedocs.io/en/latest/aerospike.html#client-config

[juliannguyen4]

Done

[juliannguyen4]

I added a docs preview at the top

[dwelch-spike]

Code LGTM but I think you should note that client level policies don't accept expressions in the docs. See my other comment.

[dwelch-spike]

LGTM