Add WebUI for S3 bucket #413
Conversation
kvaps
force-pushed
the
bucket-ui
branch
4 times, most recently
from
fdfd57e to
af01d5c
Compare
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications primarily focused on enhancing the Kubernetes deployment of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
packages/system/bucket/values.yaml (1)
1-1: Consider enhancing thebucketNameconfiguration with comments and validation.The addition of the
bucketNameparameter is a good start for allowing customization of the S3 bucket name. However, there are a few improvements that could make this configuration more robust and user-friendly:
- Add a comment explaining the purpose of this parameter and any naming constraints for S3 buckets.
- Consider whether an empty string is the best default value. If a bucket name is required, it might be better to use a placeholder value or add a comment indicating that user configuration is necessary.
- If possible, add validation rules or constraints for the bucket name to ensure it meets S3 naming requirements.
Here's a suggested improvement:
# Name of the S3 bucket to be created or used. # Must be between 3 and 63 characters long, contain only lowercase letters, numbers, dots, and hyphens. # Cannot start or end with a dot or hyphen. # Required: Yes bucketName: "my-default-bucket-name"This provides more context and guidance for users configuring the system.
packages/apps/bucket/templates/helmrelease.yaml (1)
1-18: Enhance configuration with comments and resource specificationsTo improve the maintainability and reliability of the deployment, consider the following additions:
Add comments to describe the purpose and function of this HelmRelease. This will help future maintainers understand the configuration quickly.
Specify resource requests and limits for the deployed components. This ensures proper resource allocation and prevents potential resource starvation issues.
Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions:
apiVersion: helm.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v2 kind: HelmRelease metadata: name: {{ .Release.Name }}-system annotations: description: "Deploys the cozy-bucket application for S3 bucket management" spec: # ... (existing spec) values: bucketName: {{ .Release.Name }} resources: requests: cpu: 100m memory: 128Mi limits: cpu: 500m memory: 512MiWould you like me to provide a more detailed example tailored to your specific deployment needs?
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
packages/system/bucket/templates/secret.yaml (3)
1-5: Consider adding error handling for missing Secret or fields.The approach for retrieving and parsing data from the existing Secret is correct. However, consider adding error handling in case the Secret or expected fields don't exist. This will make the template more robust and easier to debug.
You could use Helm's
requiredfunction to ensure the Secret exists and contains the expected data. For example:{{- $existingSecret := required "Existing Secret not found" (lookup "v1" "Secret" .Release.Namespace .Values.bucketName) }} {{- $bucketInfo := required "BucketInfo not found in existing Secret" (fromJson (b64dec (index $existingSecret.data "BucketInfo"))) }}🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
7-15: Approve Secret structure with suggestion for endpoint handling.The Secret structure is well-defined and follows Kubernetes best practices. Using
stringDataimproves readability and maintainability.Consider a more robust approach for handling the endpoint:
endpoint: {{ $endpoint | trimPrefix "https://" | trimPrefix "http://" }}This will ensure the prefix is removed regardless of whether it's "http://" or "https://", making the template more flexible.
1-1: Address YAML linting error.The YAML linter is reporting a syntax error at the beginning of the file. This is likely due to the Helm templating syntax, which is not standard YAML.
To suppress this linting error, consider adding a YAML directive at the beginning of the file:
--- # yamllint disable rule:syntax {{- $existingSecret := lookup "v1" "Secret" .Release.Namespace .Values.bucketName }} # ... rest of the fileThis will disable the syntax rule for this file while keeping other YAML linting rules active.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/bucket/Makefile (4)
1-6: LGTM! Consider using a more specific version tag.The variable definitions and includes look good. Exporting the NAME variable and including common makefiles are good practices.
Consider using a more specific version tag for S3MANAGER_TAG, such as
v0.5.0-alpha.1orv0.5.0-rc.1, to indicate that this is a new feature in development.
8-10: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.The 'update' target correctly removes the existing 'charts' directory and pulls the latest etcd-operator chart. This ensures the package is using the most up-to-date dependencies.
Consider adding error handling to the helm pull command. For example:
update: rm -rf charts helm pull oci://ghcr.io/aenix-io/charts/etcd-operator --untar --untardir charts || (echo "Failed to pull etcd-operator chart"; exit 1)This will provide a clear error message if the chart pull fails.
12-25: LGTM! Consider optimizing the build process.The image build process is well-structured and uses modern Docker features like buildx for multi-platform builds and caching mechanisms for efficiency.
Consider the following improvements:
Instead of generating and then removing the metadata file, you could pipe the output directly:
docker buildx build ... --output type=image,name=$(REGISTRY)/s3manager:$(call settag,$(S3MANAGER_TAG)),push=$(PUSH) \ | tee >(yq e '."containerimage.digest"' - > images/s3manager.tag)Use variables for repeated values to improve maintainability:
S3MANAGER_IMAGE=$(REGISTRY)/s3manager:$(call settag,$(S3MANAGER_TAG)) image-s3manager: docker buildx build --platform linux/amd64 --build-arg ARCH=amd64 images/s3manager \ --provenance false \ --tag $(S3MANAGER_IMAGE) \ ...Consider adding a
.PHONYdirective for the targets to ensure they always run:.PHONY: image image-s3manager
1-25: Overall, this Makefile is well-structured and follows good practices.The Makefile provides clear targets for updating dependencies and building images, utilizing modern Docker features and OCI registries. It's a solid foundation for managing the s3manager-system package.
To further improve the Makefile:
- Consider adding a
helptarget that describes available targets and their purposes.- If there are any cleanup operations needed, consider adding a
cleantarget.- If this package requires any testing, add a
testtarget to run those tests.These additions would make the Makefile more comprehensive and user-friendly for developers working on this package.
packages/system/bucket/templates/ingress.yaml (2)
1-3: Consider adding error handling for missing annotations.The code retrieves custom annotations
namespace.cozystack.io/hostandnamespace.cozystack.io/ingressfrom the namespace. It's advisable to add error handling in case these annotations are missing, to prevent potential runtime errors.Here's a suggestion for error handling:
{{- $host := index $myNS.metadata.annotations "namespace.cozystack.io/host" | default "default-host" }} {{- $ingress := index $myNS.metadata.annotations "namespace.cozystack.io/ingress" | default "nginx" }}This will use default values if the annotations are missing. Adjust the default values as appropriate for your use case.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
16-28: Consider adding TLS configuration for secure communication.The Ingress resource currently doesn't include any TLS configuration. For production environments, it's highly recommended to enable HTTPS to ensure secure communication.
Consider adding a TLS configuration like this:
spec: tls: - hosts: - {{ .Values.bucketName }}.{{ $host }} secretName: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-tlsMake sure to create the corresponding TLS secret or use cert-manager for automatic certificate management.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- packages/apps/bucket/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/apps/bucket/templates/helmrelease.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/bucket/.helmignore (1 hunks)
- packages/system/bucket/Chart.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/bucket/Makefile (1 hunks)
- packages/system/bucket/images/s3manager.tag (1 hunks)
- packages/system/bucket/images/s3manager/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- packages/system/bucket/images/s3manager/cozystack.patch (1 hunks)
- packages/system/bucket/templates/deployment.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/bucket/templates/ingress.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/bucket/templates/secret.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/bucket/templates/service.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/bucket/values.yaml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- packages/system/bucket/.helmignore
- packages/system/bucket/Chart.yaml
- packages/system/bucket/images/s3manager.tag
- packages/system/bucket/images/s3manager/cozystack.patch
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
packages/apps/bucket/templates/helmrelease.yaml
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
packages/system/bucket/templates/deployment.yaml
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
packages/system/bucket/templates/ingress.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/bucket/templates/secret.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/bucket/templates/service.yaml
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
🪛 Hadolint
packages/system/bucket/images/s3manager/Dockerfile
[error] 6-6: Use COPY instead of ADD for files and folders
(DL3020)
🪛 Gitleaks
packages/system/bucket/templates/secret.yaml
18-18: Possible Kubernetes Secret detected, posing a risk of leaking credentials/tokens from your deployments
(kubernetes-secret-with-data-after)
🔇 Additional comments (16)
packages/system/bucket/templates/service.yaml (2)
1-12: LGTM! The Service configuration looks good.The Service is well-defined with appropriate settings:
- It uses the correct API version and kind for a Kubernetes Service.
- The name and selector use the
{{ .Values.bucketName }}variable, which allows for dynamic configuration.- The Service exposes port 8080, which matches the targetPort.
- The ClusterIP type is suitable for internal cluster communication.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
4-4: Note: Ignore the yamllint error for this line.The yamllint tool reports a syntax error here, but this is a false positive. The syntax
{{ .Values.bucketName }}is valid Helm template syntax. Static analysis tools sometimes struggle with template languages.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
packages/apps/bucket/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml (3)
12-13: LGTM: New secret resource added for credentialsThe addition of
{{ .Release.Name }}-credentialsto the list of secret resources is appropriate for the WebUI implementation. This likely contains authentication information needed for S3 bucket management. The read-only permissions (get, list, watch) are suitable for a dashboard role.
14-19: LGTM: New rule added for UI ingressThe addition of a new rule for the
{{ .Release.Name }}-uiingress resource is appropriate for the WebUI implementation. This allows the dashboard to access information about the ingress configuration for the UI. The read-only permissions (get, list, watch) are suitable for a dashboard role, and the specific resourceName ensures proper access control.
12-19: Summary: Role updated to support WebUI for S3 bucket managementThe changes to this Role definition are well-structured and align with the PR objective of adding a WebUI for S3 bucket management. The additions include:
- Access to a new credentials secret, likely for authentication.
- Access to the UI ingress resource for network configuration.
Both changes grant only read permissions, which is appropriate for a dashboard role. The use of
{{ .Release.Name }}in resource names ensures proper scoping of permissions to the specific release.packages/apps/bucket/templates/helmrelease.yaml (2)
1-18: LGTM: Well-structured HelmRelease configurationThe overall structure of the HelmRelease resource is correct and follows Kubernetes and Flux CD conventions. Good practices observed:
- Use of the latest Flux CD v2 API version.
- Dynamic release naming using Helm template expressions.
- Clear specification of the chart source and version.
- Defined interval for update checks and timeout for operations.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
4-4: Ignore yamllint false positive for Helm template syntaxThe yamllint tool reports a syntax error on this line, but it's a false positive. The use of Helm template expressions
{{ .Release.Name }}is valid and common in Helm charts.To avoid future false positives, consider adding a
.yamllintconfiguration file to the project root with the following content:rules: document-start: disable truthy: check-keys: false line-length: disableThis configuration will help yamllint better handle Helm-specific syntax.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
packages/system/bucket/images/s3manager/Dockerfile (5)
8-8: LGTM: Appropriate build command for static binaryThe build command uses appropriate flags to create a statically linked binary, which is ideal for minimal container images.
10-13: LGTM: Good security practices with Alpine and non-root userUsing Alpine Linux as the base image helps minimize the container size. Creating and using a non-root user (
s3manager) is a great security practice.
13-16: LGTM: Proper package installation and binary setupThe necessary packages are installed, and the binary is copied with appropriate permissions. The use of
dumb-initis good for proper signal handling in containers.
17-20: LGTM: Correct entrypoint and command setupThe configuration correctly sets the user, exposes the port, and sets up the entrypoint with
dumb-init. This ensures proper process management and signal handling.
1-20: Overall: Well-structured Dockerfile with good practicesThis Dockerfile demonstrates several good practices:
- Use of multi-stage builds to minimize the final image size.
- Employing Alpine Linux as the base image for the final stage.
- Creating and using a non-root user for improved security.
- Proper use of
dumb-initfor signal handling.Minor improvements have been suggested in previous comments, mainly regarding:
- Using
git cloneinstead ofwgetfor source code retrieval.- Replacing
ADDwithCOPYfor simple file copying.Implementing these suggestions will further enhance the quality and maintainability of this Dockerfile.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Hadolint
[error] 6-6: Use COPY instead of ADD for files and folders
(DL3020)
packages/system/bucket/templates/deployment.yaml (1)
1-4: LGTM: Metadata section is well-defined.The metadata section correctly defines a Kubernetes Deployment with a dynamic name using the
bucketNamevalue. This approach allows for flexible naming across different environments or instances.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
packages/system/bucket/templates/ingress.yaml (3)
1-28: LGTM! Well-structured Ingress resource with some suggestions for improvement.The Ingress resource is well-defined and properly utilizes Helm templating. It correctly sets up routing for the S3 bucket UI service. Here's a summary of the key points and suggestions:
- Consider adding error handling for missing namespace annotations.
- Verify the existence of the referenced auth secret.
- Review the high proxy timeout values to ensure they're appropriate for your use case.
- Consider adding TLS configuration for secure communication.
- Verify the existence and correct configuration of the backend service.
Addressing these points will enhance the robustness and security of your Ingress configuration.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
14-15: Consider reviewing the high proxy timeout values.The proxy read and send timeout values are set to 99999 seconds, which is approximately 27.7 hours. This seems unusually high and might lead to resource allocation issues. Consider if such long timeouts are necessary for your use case, or if more reasonable values would suffice.
To understand the rationale behind these timeout values, you can search for any comments or documentation explaining this choice:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for comments or documentation about the timeout values rg -n -C 3 "proxy.*timeout"
25-28: Verify the existence of the backend service.The Ingress is configured to route traffic to a service named
{{ .Values.bucketName }}-uion port 8080. Ensure that this service exists and is correctly configured to handle traffic on port 8080.To verify the existence of the backend service, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the backend service is defined in the templates # Test 1: Check for Service resource definition fd -e yaml -e tpl | xargs grep -n "kind: Service" # Test 2: Check for specific service name pattern rg -n "name: .*-ui" # Test 3: Check for port 8080 configuration rg -n "port: 8080"
| version: '*' | ||
| interval: 1m0s | ||
| timeout: 5m0s | ||
| values: | ||
| bucketName: {{ .Release.Name }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refining chart version and update interval
While the configuration is functional, consider the following improvements:
-
Chart Version: The use of
'*'(line 14) for the chart version allows for automatic updates to the latest version. This can lead to unexpected changes in your deployment. Consider pinning to a specific version for stability, e.g.,version: '1.0.0'. -
Update Interval: The 1-minute interval (line 15) for update checks might be too frequent. Consider increasing this to reduce unnecessary load, e.g.,
interval: 15m0sorinterval: 1h0s. -
Bucket Naming: The use of the release name for
bucketName(line 18) ensures uniqueness but may need additional consideration:- Ensure it meets any naming conventions or length limitations for your S3 implementation.
- Consider adding a prefix or suffix to clearly identify the bucket's purpose or environment.
Would you like assistance in implementing these suggestions?
| FROM docker.io/library/golang:1 AS builder | ||
| WORKDIR /usr/src/app | ||
| RUN wget -O- https://github.com/cloudlena/s3manager/archive/9a7c8e446b422f8973b8c461990f39fdafee9c27.tar.gz | tar -xzf- --strip 1 | ||
| ADD cozystack.patch / |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use COPY instead of ADD for simple file copying
As per Docker best practices and the Hadolint suggestion, it's recommended to use COPY instead of ADD for simple file copying.
Replace the ADD instruction with COPY:
-ADD cozystack.patch /
+COPY cozystack.patch /This change improves clarity and follows Docker best practices.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ADD cozystack.patch / | |
| COPY cozystack.patch / |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Hadolint
[error] 6-6: Use COPY instead of ADD for files and folders
(DL3020)
| RUN wget -O- https://github.com/cloudlena/s3manager/archive/9a7c8e446b422f8973b8c461990f39fdafee9c27.tar.gz | tar -xzf- --strip 1 | ||
| ADD cozystack.patch / | ||
| RUN git apply /cozystack.patch |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using git clone for source code retrieval
While the current method works, using git clone is more conventional and offers better traceability. It also allows for easier updates to newer versions in the future.
Consider replacing lines 5-7 with:
-RUN wget -O- https://github.com/cloudlena/s3manager/archive/9a7c8e446b422f8973b8c461990f39fdafee9c27.tar.gz | tar -xzf- --strip 1
-ADD cozystack.patch /
-RUN git apply /cozystack.patch
+RUN git clone --depth 1 --branch <tag_or_branch> https://github.com/cloudlena/s3manager.git . && \
+ git checkout 9a7c8e446b422f8973b8c461990f39fdafee9c27 && \
+ git apply /cozystack.patchAlso, consider documenting the purpose of cozystack.patch in a comment.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Hadolint
[error] 6-6: Use COPY instead of ADD for files and folders
(DL3020)
| apiVersion: v1 | ||
| kind: Secret | ||
| metadata: | ||
| name: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui-auth | ||
| data: | ||
| auth: {{ htpasswd $accessKeyID $accessSecretKey | b64enc | quote }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approve Secret structure with security concern.
The Secret structure for UI authentication is correct and uses appropriate functions for generating and encoding the auth string.
However, there's a potential security risk in reusing S3 credentials for UI authentication. This practice could lead to unnecessary exposure of S3 credentials and violates the principle of least privilege.
Consider using separate credentials for UI authentication, possibly generated within the template or provided as separate input values. This would allow for better access control and reduce the risk if the UI credentials are compromised.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
18-18: Possible Kubernetes Secret detected, posing a risk of leaking credentials/tokens from your deployments
(kubernetes-secret-with-data-after)
| containers: | ||
| - name: s3manager | ||
| image: "{{ $.Files.Get "images/s3manager.tag" | trim }}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add resource limits and requests for the container.
To ensure proper resource allocation and prevent potential resource contention, it's recommended to specify resource limits and requests for the container. This helps Kubernetes schedule and manage the pod effectively.
Consider adding the following to the container specification:
resources:
limits:
cpu: "500m"
memory: "256Mi"
requests:
cpu: "100m"
memory: "128Mi"Adjust these values based on the actual requirements of your application.
| - name: SKIP_SSL_VERIFICATION | ||
| value: "true" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reconsider skipping SSL verification in production.
The current configuration sets SKIP_SSL_VERIFICATION to "true", which can pose security risks, especially in production environments. This setting bypasses certificate validation, potentially exposing the application to man-in-the-middle attacks.
Consider one of the following options:
- Remove this environment variable and ensure proper SSL certificates are in place.
- Make this configurable via Helm values to allow different settings per environment.
Example of making it configurable:
- name: SKIP_SSL_VERIFICATION
value: {{ .Values.skipSSLVerification | quote }}Then in your values.yaml:
skipSSLVerification: falseThis allows you to override it for development environments if necessary, while keeping production secure by default.
| containers: | ||
| - name: s3manager | ||
| image: "{{ $.Files.Get "images/s3manager.tag" | trim }}" | ||
| env: | ||
| - name: ENDPOINT | ||
| valueFrom: | ||
| secretKeyRef: | ||
| name: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-credentials | ||
| key: endpoint | ||
| - name: SKIP_SSL_VERIFICATION | ||
| value: "true" | ||
| - name: ACCESS_KEY_ID | ||
| valueFrom: | ||
| secretKeyRef: | ||
| name: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-credentials | ||
| key: accessKey | ||
| - name: SECRET_ACCESS_KEY | ||
| valueFrom: | ||
| secretKeyRef: | ||
| name: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-credentials | ||
| key: secretKey |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add readiness and liveness probes for improved reliability.
To enhance the reliability and manageability of the deployment, consider adding readiness and liveness probes. These probes help Kubernetes determine when the container is ready to accept traffic and whether it's still healthy.
Add the following to the container specification:
readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health
port: 8080
initialDelaySeconds: 10
periodSeconds: 5
livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health
port: 8080
initialDelaySeconds: 15
periodSeconds: 10Adjust the path and port according to your application's health check endpoint. These probes will ensure that traffic is only routed to the container when it's ready and that it's restarted if it becomes unresponsive.
| spec: | ||
| replicas: 1 | ||
| selector: | ||
| matchLabels: | ||
| app: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui | ||
| template: | ||
| metadata: | ||
| labels: | ||
| app: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui | ||
| spec: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider high availability for production environments.
The current configuration uses a single replica, which may be sufficient for development or testing. However, for production environments, consider increasing the number of replicas to ensure high availability and fault tolerance.
spec:
- replicas: 1
+ replicas: 2This change would create two instances of the UI, improving reliability and allowing for zero-downtime updates.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| spec: | |
| replicas: 1 | |
| selector: | |
| matchLabels: | |
| app: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui | |
| template: | |
| metadata: | |
| labels: | |
| app: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui | |
| spec: | |
| spec: | |
| replicas: 2 | |
| selector: | |
| matchLabels: | |
| app: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui | |
| template: | |
| metadata: | |
| labels: | |
| app: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui | |
| spec: |
| apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1 | ||
| kind: Ingress | ||
| metadata: | ||
| name: {{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui | ||
| annotations: | ||
| nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/auth-type: "basic" | ||
| nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/auth-secret: "{{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui-auth" | ||
| nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/auth-realm: "Authentication Required" | ||
| nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/proxy-body-size: "0" | ||
| nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/proxy-read-timeout: "99999" | ||
| nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/proxy-send-timeout: "99999" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Auth Secret Definition Missing
The secret {{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui-auth referenced in the nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/auth-secret annotation does not appear to be defined in the templates.
- Reference found in
packages/system/bucket/templates/ingress.yaml
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify the existence of the auth secret.
The Ingress resource is well-structured with appropriate annotations for basic authentication and proxy configurations. However, ensure that the secret {{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui-auth referenced in the nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/auth-secret annotation exists and is properly configured.
To verify the existence of the secret, you can run:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the auth secret exists in the template or is created elsewhere
# Test 1: Check if the secret is defined in the templates
fd -e yaml -e tpl | xargs grep -n "kind: Secret"
# Test 2: Check if there's a reference to creating this secret
rg -n "{{ .Values.bucketName }}-ui-auth"
Length of output: 41327
| @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ build: | |||
| make -C packages/system/kubeovn image | |||
| make -C packages/system/dashboard image | |||
| make -C packages/system/kamaji image | |||
| make -C packages/system/bucket image | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Build process fails due to missing make utility.
The command make -C packages/system/bucket image failed because make is not installed in the build environment. To resolve this:
- Add
makeas a dependency in your build environment setup. - Alternatively, modify the build process to use available tools if
makecannot be included.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify the new package build process.
The addition of make -C packages/system/bucket image to the build target is consistent with the existing structure and aligns with the PR objective of adding a WebUI for S3 bucket management.
To ensure the new package builds correctly, please run the following command and verify its output:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the build process for the new bucket package
# Test: Attempt to build the bucket package
make -C packages/system/bucket image
# Check the exit status
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Bucket package built successfully"
else
echo "Error building bucket package"
fi
Length of output: 199
 Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <[email protected]>
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
cozy-bucketapplication.s3managerapplication with necessary environment settings.Enhancements
Chores
.helmignoreto manage files excluded from Helm packaging.s3manager.