Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Enhancement]: Filter by missing chapters #3497

Closed
matijaoe opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

[Enhancement]: Filter by missing chapters #3497

matijaoe opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@matijaoe
Copy link

matijaoe commented Oct 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Type of Enhancement

Web Interface/Frontend

Describe the Feature/Enhancement

Add 'Chapters' option to 'Missing' filter in filter menu.

I have a lot more nuanced 'missing/incorrect chapters' features in mind, but this issue focuses solely on audiobooks missing chapters entirely.

preview

Why would this be helpful?

It's cumbersome to go book by book to find those with missing chapters.

Future Implementation (Screenshot)

For now, just add the Chapter option to the "Missing" filter.

Audiobookshelf Server Version

v.2.13.4

Current Implementation (Screenshot)

posted above
@matijaoe matijaoe added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 10, 2024
advplyr added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2024
@advplyr
Add:Filter for missing chapters & alphabetize missing subitems #3497
ddd2c0a
@advplyr advplyr added the awaiting release Issue is resolved and will be in the next release label Oct 12, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Fixed in v2.15.0.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting release Issue is resolved and will be in the next release label Oct 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@matijaoe @advplyr