Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Added missing piece information on using withCount() #235

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

justinsamuel92
Copy link

@justinsamuel92 justinsamuel92 commented Jan 10, 2024

πŸ”— Linked issue

Minor Enhancement in the documentation which can actually save a lot of time for developers while using withCount()

❓ Type of change

  • 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • πŸ‘Œ Enhancement (improving an existing functionality like performance)
  • ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

πŸ“š Description

An important update for getting count in the Model while using withCount(). Surely will save some time for developers

πŸ“ Checklist

  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant