-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add vl53l0x driver - finish work by Afp316 #291 #363
Conversation
Build failing due to adafruit/Adafruit_MQTT_Library#217 |
Not sure how to retrigger workflow, but just read about hash sign-off so here goes: |
I'm not familiar with #sign-off... On the workflow, https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_Wippersnapper_Arduino/actions/runs/3451873666 you should be able to re-run jobs? |
Sadly not available, I think there's a repository or Org setting for allowing workflow runs from pull requests / forks. This was related but maybe not quite the one: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/enabling-features-for-your-repository/managing-github-actions-settings-for-a-repository#enabling-workflows-for-forks-of-private-repositories |
b23b0ff
to
c74f572
Compare
Curious, builds happily on some, and on others the same warning seems fatal (or did they just time out?), in the adafruit vl53l0x library about initialisation. https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_Wippersnapper_Arduino/actions/runs/3473545620/jobs/5805679630#step:8:75 |
|
Before I do, I'd like to know why does it compiles the build/UF2 image successfully on the other ESP32 builds, like the one I linked the S2-TFT, with the warning still present? |
It did pass, but the build warnings were still thrown: https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_Wippersnapper_Arduino/actions/runs/3473545620/jobs/5805679630#step:8:73 I'm not sure why at the moment..
When a struct is initialized, it must contain all members within the brace-enclosed list of initializers
Not if we can fix it :) |
c74f572
to
e876fcd
Compare
So there was a missing bit in wippersnapper related to the setting of the time of last poll for the proximity sensor type. Now just another initialisation warning that I'll stick up an issue for or fix eventually, but the sensor works for now on address 29. The Dev flag in components with the banners is great :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tyeth Read over the PR, some comments..
@tyeth - OK, addressed in adafruit/Adafruit_VL53L0X#59 and released in https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_VL53L0X/releases/tag/1.2.1. Arduino Lib manager will pick this up (probably later today) and I will re-kick the CI. Thanks for being patient. |
@tyeth This is failing clang/doxy (https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_Wippersnapper_Arduino/actions/runs/3517128928/jobs/6038336339). Should be ready to go after. Thanks for your patience. I've also fixed the flaky behavior for building the ESP32-Sx platforms via the CI. |
76bd6b9
to
4a2767e
Compare
Wow green lights across the board, a more rare and pleasant sight that we might like to admit 📉 |
Nice job and thank you both for your hard work and patience.
I couldn't figure out the Clang and doxygen stuff.
…On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 10:21 AM Tyeth Gundry ***@***.***> wrote:
Wow green lights across the board, a more rare and pleasant sight that we
might like to admit 📉
Congratulations on the CI work🥇 Just done the doxygen fix so that should
be it!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#363 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXAAGVQNQKJ2EICXDJYOQF3WLC7AVANCNFSM6AAAAAAR6NF2JQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Great work - thank you both. Will be included in next release. |
This just finishes off the fine work by @afp316 in #291
Rebased off of latest main, amended last commit to remove .pio/.vscode changes, ran clang-format.