-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add missing license classifier #33
Conversation
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ source: | |||
path: ../ | |||
|
|||
build: | |||
number: 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why remove the build number ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because to be consistent, we should add one too here:
And make sure that they are kept in sync.
We could do this in a follow-up PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, let's do it now and try to fix atoti/atoti#279 without having to publish a new version of atoti or fighting pip/poetry/conda to ignore the pinned version of jdk4py in atoti.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM ☕
Close #14.