Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing license classifier #33

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jun 2, 2021
Merged

Conversation

tibdex
Copy link
Member

@tibdex tibdex commented Jun 1, 2021

Close #14.

@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ source:
path: ../

build:
number: 0
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why remove the build number ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because to be consistent, we should add one too here:

https://github.com/atoti/jdk4py/blob/8810e2faad3b7eb9fee980a99ce1ae686ea6e2a4/.github/workflows/deployment.yaml#L55

And make sure that they are kept in sync.

We could do this in a follow-up PR.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, let's do it now and try to fix atoti/atoti#279 without having to publish a new version of atoti or fighting pip/poetry/conda to ignore the pinned version of jdk4py in atoti.

@tibdex tibdex requested a review from fabiencelier June 1, 2021 16:23
Copy link
Collaborator

@fabiencelier fabiencelier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ☕

@tibdex tibdex merged commit 0b60d2f into main Jun 2, 2021
@tibdex tibdex deleted the tibdex/add-missing-license-classifier branch June 2, 2021 13:04
@tibdex tibdex mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Move to OpenJDK
2 participants