Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: redeploy spoke pools to support depositExclusive #587

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

bmzig
Copy link
Contributor

@bmzig bmzig commented Aug 26, 2024

This redeploys all spoke pools which were deployed before Lisk to support depositExclusive. A nice byproduct is that now all chains also support tryMulticall.

Copy link
Contributor

@james-a-morris james-a-morris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm pending at least a second signoff

@@ -132,7 +136,7 @@ const config: HardhatUserConfig = {
},
arbitrum: {
chainId: CHAIN_IDs.ARBITRUM,
url: getNodeUrl("arbitrum", true, CHAIN_IDs.ARBITRUM),
url: getNodeUrl("arbitrum-mainnet", true, CHAIN_IDs.ARBITRUM),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these were renamed by infura?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah they must have been. They now follow a naming convention given by [network_name]-[mainnet or sepolia].infura.io.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

huh ok that makes sense, does this just not work currently with the renamed network names?

@bmzig bmzig merged commit d3cac8f into master Aug 26, 2024
11 checks passed
@bmzig bmzig deleted the bz/redeploySpokes branch August 26, 2024 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants