Add clause about not knowing minOutput.recipient
at order creation time
#9
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Its not always known who the recipient of a
minOutput
will be, especially when creating anOnchainCrossChainOrder
where the user submits their own order and theoriginData
does not contain any reference to an exclusive relayer.Moreover, even in a
GaslessCrossChainOrder
, the filler creating the deposit on the origin chain might not always fill their own order on the destination chain if they do not set themselves as an exclusive relayer.Not all settlement contracts will allow an order to specify an exclusivity clause.
Solution
Explicitly state setting
recipient: address(0)
as an option when creating theminOutputs
.