waitUntil instead of toEventually in RTN9b test. #139
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Tests were intermitently failing because of timing. This uses the same strategy as the RTN8b test above. This should be merged with some priority so that other PR tests can pass more consistently.
This was referenced Jan 20, 2016
|
LGTM |
|
Got LGTM from @ricardopereira on chat. |
tcard
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2016
waitUntil instead of toEventually in RTN9b test.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tests were intermitently failing because of timing. This uses the
same strategy as the RTN8b test above.
This should be merged with some priority so that other PR tests
can pass more consistently.