-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix spec failures #506
Merged
ricardopereira
merged 14 commits into
fix-legacy-tests-account-blocked
from
fix-spec-failures
Sep 27, 2016
Merged
Fix spec failures #506
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
73ca1d0
A few fixes in tests.
tcard 00901e1
Test suite: add `testSuite_waitForConnectionToClose`
ricardopereira 33d18a7
Fix testMultipleText_1000_10: increase timeout
ricardopereira 0b0b011
Fix connection broken after connection is closed: should wait for the…
ricardopereira 61c3b4c
Fix spec tests: expects `done` completion closure to only be called once
ricardopereira 4fd0f95
Fix: decode each REST presence message data
ricardopereira 76e29d7
Fix RSP5
ricardopereira a51116a
Fix: should error if authUrl request is returning incompatible data
ricardopereira f5801e6
Fix RTP8h, RTP9e, RTP10e: token with clientId
ricardopereira 0ce9f45
Fix RTN17e: already closed
ricardopereira ad56876
RTC8: pending
ricardopereira afc03d9
Fix #117 test: add delay
ricardopereira 2a560c5
Enhance RTP5b: wait for presence of Client2
ricardopereira 62d3610
Fix InvalidNimbleAPIUsage: nested async expectations are not allowed …
ricardopereira File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@EvgenyKarkan The re-attach is failing because the channel is in the Failed state. I saw that
RTC8
as some subspecs so I assumed that it isn't ready.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ricardopereira not sure what you mean by some subspecs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mattheworiordan I mean RTC8 is composed by RTC8a1, RTC8a2, RTC8a3, etc. So the test should be complying those but now I noticed that RTC8 is a new spec from v0.9. I will fix #485, the one responsible for failing the test.