Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Upgrade to libxrpl 2.4.0-b1 #1789

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

godexsoft
Copy link
Collaborator

Use latest beta of libxrpl and fix issues that came with it.

@godexsoft godexsoft changed the title Upgrade to libxrpl 2.4.0-b1 feat: Upgrade to libxrpl 2.4.0-b1 Dec 17, 2024
@godexsoft godexsoft marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2024 14:34
Copy link
Collaborator

@cindyyan317 cindyyan317 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.18%. Comparing base (15a441b) to head (3bbdc19).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1789   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    72.17%   72.18%           
========================================
  Files          298      298           
  Lines        12796    12804    +8     
  Branches      6544     6546    +2     
========================================
+ Hits          9236     9242    +6     
- Misses        1829     1830    +1     
- Partials      1731     1732    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@godexsoft godexsoft merged commit 2d0253b into XRPLF:develop Dec 18, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants