Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WBTC vote proposal #2: claim ownership over merchant and custodian members contract #2

Closed
yaronvel opened this issue Dec 16, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@yaronvel
Copy link
Contributor

yaronvel commented Dec 16, 2018

Overview

The role of this vote is two-fold:

  1. In this vote the DAO multisig takes control over the members contract that controls the list of merchants and custodian.
  2. By voting dao members that did not vote over the first proposal also confirm the address they supplied is valid.

Action details

Transaction id 1.

  • destination = 0x3e8640574aa764763291ed733672d3a105107ac5 (address of members contract)
  • value = 0 (no ether is sent)
  • data = 0x4e71e0c8 (first 4 bytes of Keccak-256("claimOwnership()"). Can calculate it online here)

Details can be verified at function 10 here

How to confirm

Call the multisig contract 0xd409db68d0e6e97e1cb1f3eb0bd38de278bc3c68 with function confirmTransaction and set transactionId = 1.

Abi can be taken from here

Who should vote

In this round we ask the last 10 dao members to vote, namely:

  1. Gnosis
  2. MakerDAO
  3. theocean
  4. Prycto
  5. Set Protocol
  6. Blockfolio
  7. OmiseGO
  8. GOPAX
  9. Bitgo
  10. Republic Protocol
@yaronvel
Copy link
Contributor Author

tranvictor added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2023
Change B.Protocol/RiskDAO to RiskDAO in the list of DAO memebers
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant