-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 217
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ability to remove Openverse integration with WordPress #167
Comments
@WordPress/openverse-maintainers Can we use something other than GitHub issues to track things like "ideas for future integrations" etc? This issue doesn't really have anything actionable, it's just a note for us to keep in mind whenever we start to work on an actual core integration. |
I do like that everything we're working on or planning to work on is in a single place. We could probably make a new status like "status: future" or "status: ideation" that suggests something is not currently being worked on but should be considered later on? We can put these tickets in a separate column in our projects (separate from the Backlog). |
I've added the |
The "priority" label is the one that doesn't make sense to me. Even if it's low priority it still indicates a priority implying that it is in some way actionable. At the very least we could make it "blocked" but that still feels incorrect to me. |
I don't make the association that 'importance' (priority) implies actionability, but I also think that |
That is a great idea. Thanks for bringing it @annezazu We can keep the And agree with @sarayourfriend about the no need for a priority label. I would add removing the |
…oto3-1.18.16 Bump boto3 from 1.18.11 to 1.18.16 in /openverse-api
Problem
Some folks may not want there to be access to Openverse from their WordPress site (in either direction - to submit images or to find them). This came up in the FSE Outreach Program's All Things Media Hallway Hangout:
Description
Allow a way to easily disable Openverse access. I imagine inspiration can be taken from the block plugin directory and block pattern directory integration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: