-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Core data: Fix minor type issue in onSubKey #39655
Merged
dmsnell
merged 2 commits into
trunk
from
core-data/fix-typing-issues-on-sub-key-function
Mar 31, 2022
Merged
Core data: Fix minor type issue in onSubKey #39655
dmsnell
merged 2 commits into
trunk
from
core-data/fix-typing-issues-on-sub-key-function
Mar 31, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Part of #39211 The `Function` type in `onSubKey` caused an issue when enabling TypeScript for the `core-data` module (when analyzing JS files) because it's not a callable interface. In this patch we're creating a transition type `AnyFunction` and using that as the type in `onSubKey` to remove the type error. After enabling TypeScript for the module we'll be able to provide better types on the function directly, but for now this prevents raising an error. We want to do great things with the `core-data` type system but all of these little nuisances get in the way when we're trying to study those things in isolation. This is a preparatory change to eliminate some of the noise in the existing types. As a type-only change this will have no impact on the built code. Please audit the types and the introduction of the `types.ts` where we import an actual TypeScript type into JSDoc through `@typedef`. Note that this change doesn't "fully-type" `onSubKey` in the sense that it provides full inference for the passed-through reducer. The goal is merely to avoid creating type errors when activating TypeScript across the module.
Size Change: 0 B Total Size: 1.21 MB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
adamziel
approved these changes
Mar 31, 2022
dmsnell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2022
In this commit we're cleaning up type issues in the core-data package that prevent us from telling TypeScript to run on the package and all of its existing code, even the JS files. After these changes we should be able to do so and start converting more modules to TypeScript with less friction. This patch follows a series of other smaller updates: - #39212 - #39214 - #39225 - #39476 - #39477 - #39479 - #39480 - #39525 - #39526 - #39655 - #39656 - #39659 It was built in order to support ongoing work to add types to the `getEntityRecord` family of functions in #39025.
dmsnell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2022
In this commit we're cleaning up type issues in the core-data package that prevent us from telling TypeScript to run on the package and all of its existing code, even the JS files. After these changes we should be able to do so and start converting more modules to TypeScript with less friction. This patch follows a series of other smaller updates: - #39212 - #39214 - #39225 - #39476 - #39477 - #39479 - #39480 - #39525 - #39526 - #39655 - #39656 - #39659 It was built in order to support ongoing work to add types to the `getEntityRecord` family of functions in #39025.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Part of #39211
The
Function
type inonSubKey
caused an issue when enabling TypeScriptfor the
core-data
module (when analyzing JS files) because it's not acallable interface.
In this patch we're creating a transition type
AnyFunction
and using thatas the type in
onSubKey
to remove the type error.After enabling TypeScript for the module we'll be able to provide better
types on the function directly, but for now this prevents raising an error.
We want to do great things with the
core-data
type system but all of theselittle nuisances get in the way when we're trying to study those things in
isolation. This is a preparatory change to eliminate some of the noise in the
existing types.
Testing
As a type-only change this will have no impact on the built code.
Please audit the types and the introduction of the
types.ts
wherewe import an actual TypeScript type into JSDoc through
@typedef
.Note that this change doesn't "fully-type"
onSubKey
in the sensethat it provides full inference for the passed-through reducer.
The goal is merely to avoid creating type errors when activating
TypeScript across the module.