Document that __experimentalSelector requires server-side block registration
#37984
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
oandregal
added
[Type] Developer Documentation
oandregal
requested review from
a team and
youknowriad
and removed request for
a team
|
Makes me wonder why folks are using this in the first place, it can break at any time |
aristath
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
__experimentalSelectoris still experimental and we don't have it documented in the block supports doc. However, I've seen some reports of people struggling to make this work for their use cases because their blocks were only registered client side. At least, we should have a note about it here.