Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2022: the block developer’s year in review #40

Closed
mburridge opened this issue Dec 13, 2022 Discussed in #37 · 11 comments
Closed

2022: the block developer’s year in review #40

mburridge opened this issue Dec 13, 2022 Discussed in #37 · 11 comments
Assignees
Labels
flow: needs review reviewer wanted misc: question Further information is requested

Comments

@mburridge
Copy link

Discussed in #37

Originally posted by mburridge December 12, 2022
A post wrapping up 2022 and summarising all the new developments and resources that became available during 2022.

e.g.

  • workshops/courses/tutorials on learn.wordpress.org
  • wordpress.tv videos
  • dev notes
  • updates to create-block

Can you think of any other ideas not covered in the above list?

To be published before the end of 2022.

@mburridge mburridge added the flow: needs input let's discuss this. label Dec 13, 2022
@mburridge
Copy link
Author

The start of a draft for this post is in this Google Doc.

At the moment I'm just looking for resources to add to each section. Please suggest away with any resources that you're aware of that you think should be included.

Please also say if you think I'm missing something that should be in the post.

Do you think the scope of the post is too wide? Should I be limiting the scope to just learning and documentation resources, rather than trying to give a broader overview of the year?

@mburridge mburridge self-assigned this Dec 13, 2022
@mburridge mburridge added the misc: question Further information is requested label Dec 13, 2022
@mburridge mburridge moved this to In Progress in Developer Blog Content Board Dec 13, 2022
@juanmaguitar
Copy link
Contributor

Do you think the scope of the post is too wide? Should I be limiting the scope to just learning and documentation resources, rather than trying to give a broader overview of the year?

Yes, I think that focusing on just the learning and documentation resources related to Block Development published in 2022 would make an effective and valuable post that could be shipped in the following week.

@bph bph moved this from In Progress to Topic needs approval in Developer Blog Content Board Dec 14, 2022
@abhansnuk
Copy link

Hi @mburridge. I agree that a narrower scope would be better and focusing on block development learning and documentation resources. It would be useful and perhaps we can give a call to action in it to encourage block developers to read it to find out if they know all these things came out in 2022.

@bph bph moved this from Topic needs approval to To-do in Developer Blog Content Board Dec 15, 2022
@mburridge mburridge added flow: needs review reviewer wanted and removed flow: needs input let's discuss this. labels Dec 21, 2022
@mburridge
Copy link
Author

The post is now ready for review. It would be great to get it published before the start of the Christmas holidays.

@justintadlock justintadlock moved this from To-do to Needs 1st review in Developer Blog Content Board Dec 21, 2022
@justintadlock
Copy link

First review complete. Great work, @mburridge! This will be a useful resource.

@justintadlock justintadlock moved this from Needs 1st review to Needs 2nd review in Developer Blog Content Board Dec 21, 2022
@mburridge
Copy link
Author

mburridge commented Dec 22, 2022

The preview is now available for review. If everyone is happy with it I think it would be great to schedule publication for 31st Dec.

@bph
Copy link
Collaborator

bph commented Dec 22, 2022

The above "preview" link would only be accessible for logged-in users.

A "public post preview" link can be created using the additional setting in the Documentation settings "enable public preview' and share that link when requesting a review.

Screen Shot 2022-12-22 at 13 29 08

We might have reviewers that don't have (yet) access to the site.

@bph
Copy link
Collaborator

bph commented Dec 22, 2022

@mburridge This article looks great online!
I only have minor suggestions

  • Please update the link to Roadmap to point to the top WordPress site and not to the localized gb site. https://wordpress.org/about/roadmap/

  • You could add links to the graphics where possible, so when someone clicks on them are taken to the right site and don't have them hunt down the link from the text. :-)

To keep props uniform

  • add @ the user (no need to use full names and links, the blog should pull the links from the @ mention.)
  • italic and right aligned.

With the above changes, this should be good to publish 🙌 .

There is no need to wait for Dev 31 to publish it. You could schedule it for Tuesday (27) or Wednesday (28), and it will have wider attention.

@mburridge
Copy link
Author

@bph I've made all the changes you suggested, though Wes and Courtney don't come up with @ mentions 🤷‍♂️.

Publication has been scheduled for 11:00 on Wed 28th Dec.

image

@bph
Copy link
Collaborator

bph commented Dec 22, 2022

Thanks @mburridge for letting me know about the mention not being picked up by the site.

I created an issue on the Theme repo, so I don't forget about it before I return to work

@bph bph moved this from Needs 2nd review to Published (Done) in Developer Blog Content Board Dec 23, 2022
@bph bph closed this as completed Dec 23, 2022
Repository owner moved this from Published (Done) to Ready to publish in Developer Blog Content Board Dec 23, 2022
@bph bph moved this from Ready to publish to Published (Done) in Developer Blog Content Board Dec 23, 2022
@bph
Copy link
Collaborator

bph commented Jan 2, 2023

The post was published on Dec 28th, 2022
2022: the block developer’s year in review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
flow: needs review reviewer wanted misc: question Further information is requested
Projects
Status: Published (Done)
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants