-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 492
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PrefixAllGlobals/GlobalVariablesOverride: detect variables being set via list() #1783
Merged
dingo-d
merged 5 commits into
develop
from
feature/1774-globalvarsoverride-prefixallglobals-recognize-list-assignments
Jul 30, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a699e0d
Sniff: add new `find_list_open_close()` utility method
jrfnl f30b102
Sniff::find_array_open_close(): minor tweak
jrfnl c2bae67
Sniff: add new `get_list_variables()` utility method
jrfnl bd16416
PrefixAllGlobals: detect non-prefixed variables in list assignments
jrfnl f47cf7b
GlobalVariablesOverride: detect global variable overrides in list ass…
jrfnl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be added as a util method in the
Sniff.php
likeget_list_variables
is? Because it's used in two places.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair question. IMO no.
process_...()
methods are not utility methods, but sniff processing specific. IMO they can either be in the sniff itself or in an abstract sniff - or possibly a sniff helpertrait
.As these two sniffs are basically the polar opposite of each other, a case can be made to refactor them and either work with an abstract class, a trait or let one sniff extend the other.
(and yes, I've been thinking about that myself as well)
That was not what this PR is about though. This PR adds certain missing functionality. To keep things clean and reviewable, the refactor should - again IMO - be done in a separate PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the explanation, this makes more sense now. And I agree, implementing either a trait or an abstract class seems like overkill for now.
👍