Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Endianness test #115

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 9, 2015
Merged

Endianness test #115

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 9, 2015

Conversation

pjuftring
Copy link
Contributor

This tests, if all load and store operations use little-endian.

This tests, if all load and store operations use little-endian.
Removed the endianness-test from the ToDo-list.
@sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

Please use spaces rather than tabs, for consistency with the other tests. Otherwise this lgtm.

All tabs in endianness.wast are replaced with two spaces for consistency
with the other tests.
@jfbastien
Copy link
Member

@pjuftring, could you confirm that you're a W3C CG participant (it seems so) and that you're not representing a company in particular? Thanks!

@pjuftring
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jfbastien I'm a W3C CG participant and not representing a company.

@sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

Great, thanks!

sunfishcode added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2015
@sunfishcode sunfishcode merged commit ecb1ae6 into WebAssembly:master Oct 9, 2015
@pjuftring pjuftring deleted the endianness branch October 9, 2015 18:06
alexcrichton pushed a commit to alexcrichton/spec that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2019
eqrion pushed a commit to eqrion/wasm-spec that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2019
Implement bulk memory operations in small-step semantics, as in spec.

Minor fixes:
- In spec, memory.copy was missing use of \vconst in the backwards case
- In interpreter & test, memory.init still trapped if segment has been dropped but length parameter was 0.
Connicpu pushed a commit to Connicpu/wasm-spec that referenced this pull request May 11, 2020
dhil pushed a commit to dhil/webassembly-spec that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2023
…bAssembly#115)

This reverts commit 10d6c6c.

This reverts WebAssembly#96, which squashed all upstream commits into one, which
was not the recommended way in
https://github.com/WebAssembly/proposals/blob/master/howto.md#syncing-with-upstream-changes.

This leaves README.md untouched because WebAssembly#99 made significant changes on
top of the merged version already.
rossberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2024
call `ref.func` needs to be declared first
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants