-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Opcode for delegate #145
Comments
Following V8 implementation, I was tentatively using |
Thanks for pointing out the conflict with function references, @takikawa. |
pull bot
pushed a commit
to p-g-krish/v8
that referenced
this issue
Jan 15, 2021
Replace 0x16 with 0x18 for the delegate opcode, to avoid a conflict with the function reference proposal. See WebAssembly/exception-handling#145 [email protected] Bug: v8:8091 Change-Id: Ib012f8680dfece200973e18fdf6c82877f10d5de Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2632604 Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <[email protected]> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72118}
This was referenced Feb 9, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In #137 it's mentioned that the opcode for
delegate
needs to be decided. Has there been any discussion of that yet?As mentioned in #137, the
0x0?
opcodes are used up. I believe the V8 code is currently using0x16
as a placeholder, but I think that and0x17
are used by the function references proposal.It looks like
0x18
or0x19
may be available though based on looking through the current proposals.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: