Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VP-2011: Use available inventory if nothing in default ffc #405

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 22, 2020

Conversation

yecli
Copy link
Contributor

@yecli yecli commented Apr 21, 2020

If item do not have record for inventory in default ffc, other available inventories could be used for inventory checking;

yecli added 3 commits April 20, 2020 20:57
If item do not have record for inventory in default ffc, other available inventories could be used for inventory checking;
@yecli yecli requested a review from tatarincev April 21, 2020 14:45
@@ -51,9 +51,11 @@ public virtual async Task EvaluateProductInventoriesAsync(IEnumerable<Product> p
//TODO: Change these conditions to DDD specification
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

INFO Complete the task associated to this 'TODO' comment. rule

@vc-ci
Copy link
Contributor

vc-ci commented Apr 21, 2020

SonarQube analysis reported 2 issues

  • MAJOR 1 major
  • INFO 1 info

Watch the comments in this conversation to review them.

1 extra issue

Note: The following issues were found on lines that were not modified in the pull request. Because these issues can't be reported as line comments, they are summarized here:

  1. MAJOR InventoryService.cs#L32: Split this method into two, one handling parameters check and the other handling the asynchronous code. rule

@yecli yecli merged commit a80b3f8 into dev Apr 22, 2020
@yecli yecli deleted the vp-2011-no-default-ffc-inventory-fix branch April 22, 2020 10:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants