Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "periodic boundary conditions" to README #7

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2020
Merged

Add "periodic boundary conditions" to README #7

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2020

Conversation

timholy
Copy link
Contributor

@timholy timholy commented Oct 12, 2020

This is the term I searched for on juliahub but didn't discover this package. I thought adding it to the README might help.

This is the term I searched for on juliahub but didn't discover this package. I thought adding it to the README might help.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 12, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #7 into master will increase coverage by 21.05%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master       #7       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   73.68%   94.73%   +21.05%     
===========================================
  Files           1        1               
  Lines          19       19               
===========================================
+ Hits           14       18        +4     
+ Misses          5        1        -4     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/CircularArrays.jl 94.73% <0.00%> (+21.05%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f00ae95...7c537da. Read the comment docs.

@Vexatos
Copy link
Owner

Vexatos commented Oct 12, 2020

I don't see why not. Thanks!

@Vexatos Vexatos merged commit 041d8d3 into Vexatos:master Oct 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants