list: list item markers (link to discourse page) (#1027)

_u-dep/list.md

@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ punct(Food, ,-9)
 
 However, `list` should not be over-used. If a construction can easily be analyzed using the grammatical relations of standard sentences, typically as a coordinated structure, then it should be analyzed with these more standard relations, even if it is laid out as a list typographically.  In particular, when the list is written as a single sentence, with commas and overt coordination, then it should be analyzed as a coordinated structure.
 
+<!--
 For list items, the de facto decision taken in [issue 156](https://github.com/UniversalDependencies/docs/issues/156) is that, for enumerated lists, regardless of whether the items are numbered with arabic, roman, or other numerals, or are given letters, we will regard the item contents as the head, and the item enumerator will be a `nummod` of it and given the part of speech `NUM`. Any punctuation with the list item will be a `punct` dependent of the item enumerator. For itemized lists with bullet, dash or similar markers, the current standard is to give the marker a `PUNCT` part of speech and then to give it the dependency relation `punct` to the head of the item content.
+-->
+For list item markers, see [discourse]().
 
 <!-- Interlanguage links updated Po 6. listopadu 2023, 21:43:00 CET -->