Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added a test with a path diversion because of jdk statics #2067

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 29, 2023

Conversation

Damtev
Copy link
Member

@Damtev Damtev commented Mar 29, 2023

Description

As described in #716, we have predicted a possible coverage regression because of not setting static fields from trusted libraries (JDK, for example). So, in this PR a test was added that demonstrates such a regression.

How to test

Automated tests

org.utbot.examples.stdlib.StaticsPathDiversionTest.

Manual tests

Not applicable.

Self-check list

  • I've set the proper labels for my PR (at least, for category and component).
  • PR title and description are clear and intelligible.
  • I've added enough comments to my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • The functionality I've repaired, changed or added is covered with automated tests.
  • Manual tests have been provided optionally.
  • The documentation for the functionality I've been working on is up-to-date.

@Damtev Damtev added ctg-question Further information is requested comp-symbolic-engine Issue is related to the symbolic execution engine labels Mar 29, 2023
@Damtev Damtev force-pushed the damtev/trusted_statics_path_diversion branch from fa0689a to d945d54 Compare March 29, 2023 11:28
@Damtev Damtev merged commit d6a1e30 into main Mar 29, 2023
@Damtev Damtev deleted the damtev/trusted_statics_path_diversion branch March 29, 2023 12:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
comp-symbolic-engine Issue is related to the symbolic execution engine ctg-question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants