Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prevent frontogenesis from returning nans #3696

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 12 additions & 3 deletions src/metpy/calc/kinematics.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -567,9 +567,18 @@ def frontogenesis(potential_temperature, u, v, dx=None, dy=None, x_dim=-1, y_dim

# Compute the angle (beta) between the wind field and the gradient of potential temperature
psi = 0.5 * np.arctan2(shrd, strd)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you're interested in eliminating all trig:

We have $\tan(2 \psi) =\frac{shrd}{strd}$, which implies $\cos(2\psi)=\frac{strd}{\sqrt{shrd^2+strd^2}}$. We use psi next line to find $\cos(\psi)$ and $\sin(\psi)$.

We show later that $\cos(2\psi) = 1 - 2 \sin^2(\psi) = 2 \cos^2(\psi) - 1$. Rearranging those identities gives
$\cos(\psi) = \sqrt{\frac{1 + \cos(2 \psi)}{2} }$
$\sin(\psi) = \sqrt{\frac{1 - \cos(2 \psi)}{2} } = \sqrt{1-\cos^2(\psi)}$
This lets you replace three trig functions and a multiplication with three or four multiplications, three additions, three square roots, and a division, and four trips through the data with eight. I have no idea whether the eliminating the trig calls makes up for the extra trips through the data.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I ran through that too and wasn't wild about all the square roots. I'm not passionate about trying it but if someone wants to see about performance/accuracy, I'd entertain it.

beta = np.arcsin((-ddx_theta * np.cos(psi) - ddy_theta * np.sin(psi)) / mag_theta)

return 0.5 * mag_theta * (tdef * np.cos(2 * beta) - div)
# We need to be careful to avoid division by zero. When mag_theta
# is zero, the frontogenesis will also be zero. The minus signs
# are omitted from the numerator since this expression is squared
# to compute the frontogenesis.
sin_beta = np.divide(ddx_theta * np.cos(psi) + ddy_theta * np.sin(psi), mag_theta,
out=np.zeros_like(mag_theta), where=mag_theta != 0)

# The textbook definition of frontogenesis includes the term
# cos(2*beta). However, using trig identities, one can show that
# cos(2*beta) = 1 - 2 * sin(beta)**2, and the expression involving
# sin(beta) is more numerically stable.
return 0.5 * mag_theta * (tdef * (1 - 2 * sin_beta**2) - div)


@exporter.export
Expand Down
53 changes: 53 additions & 0 deletions tests/calc/test_kinematics.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -307,6 +307,59 @@ def test_frontogenesis_asym():
assert_almost_equal(fronto, true_fronto)


def test_frontogenesis_nan():
"""Test that frontogenesis calculation does not result in nan."""
x = np.array([-4142340.8, -4061069.8, -3979798.8, -3898527.8, -3817256.8],
dtype=np.float32)
y = np.array([-832207.56, -750936.56, -669665.56, -588394.5, -507123.56],
dtype=np.float32)
lat = np.array([[12.38805122, 12.58268367, 12.77387305, 12.96159447, 13.14582354],
[13.07545967, 13.27159197, 13.46425116, 13.65341235, 13.83905111],
[13.76423766, 13.96186003, 14.15597929, 14.34657051, 14.53360928],
[14.45429168, 14.65339375, 14.84896275, 15.04097373, 15.22940228],
[15.14552468, 15.3460955, 15.54310332, 15.73652321, 15.92633074]])
lon = np.array([[-132.75696788, -132.05286812, -131.34671228, -130.63852983,
-129.92835084],
[-132.9590417, -132.25156385, -131.54199837, -130.83037505,
-130.11672431],
[-133.16323241, -132.45234731, -131.73934239, -131.02424779,
-130.30709426],
[-133.36957268, -132.65525085, -131.93877637, -131.22017972,
-130.49949199],
[-133.57809517, -132.86030681, -132.14033233, -131.41820252,
-130.69394884]])
uvals = np.array([[0.165024, 0.055023, -0.454977, -1.534977, -2.744976],
[0.155024, -0.434977, -2.114977, -3.474977, -4.034977],
[-1.554977, -2.714977, -2.084976, -5.274977, -3.334976],
[-3.424976, -7.644977, -7.654977, -5.384976, -3.224977],
[-9.564977, -9.934977, -7.454977, -6.004977, -4.144977]]) * units('m/s')
vvals = (np.array([[2.6594982, 1.9194984, 2.979498, 2.149498, 2.6394978],
[3.4994984, 4.0794983, 4.8494987, 5.2594986, 3.1694984],
[5.159498, 6.4594975, 6.559498, 5.9694977, 3.189499],
[6.5994987, 9.799498, 7.4594975, 4.2894993, 3.729498],
[11.3394985, 6.779499, 4.0994987, 4.819498, 4.9994984]])
* units('m/s'))
tvals = np.array([[290.2, 290.1, 290.2, 290.30002, 290.30002],
[290.5, 290.30002, 290.30002, 290.30002, 290.2],
[290.80002, 290.40002, 290.2, 290.40002, 289.90002],
[290.7, 290.90002, 290.7, 290.1, 289.7],
[290.90002, 290.40002, 289.7, 289.7, 289.30002]]) * units('degK')

x = xr.DataArray(data=x, coords={'x': x}, dims='x', attrs={'units': 'meters'})
y = xr.DataArray(data=y, coords={'y': y}, dims='y', attrs={'units': 'meters'})

dims = ['y', 'x']
coords = {'x': x, 'y': y, 'latitude': (dims, lat), 'longitude': (dims, lon)}

u = xr.DataArray(data=uvals, coords=coords, dims=dims)
v = xr.DataArray(data=vvals, coords=coords, dims=dims)
t = xr.DataArray(data=tvals, coords=coords, dims=dims)

th = potential_temperature(850 * units('hPa'), t)
f = frontogenesis(th, u, v)
assert not np.any(np.isnan(f))


def test_advection_uniform():
"""Test advection calculation for a uniform 1D field."""
u = np.ones((3,)) * units('m/s')
Expand Down