-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 709
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@description tag missing from default #2618
Comments
This behavior is not respected by typedoc, and frankly it sounds like a terrible idea to me, which is why As your IDE obviously isn't following this behavior either, my question is - why is this tag useful over just including a paragraph break in the comment summary section? /**
* Some docs
*
* More docs that were previously under `@description
*/ |
@Gerrit0 I see the “title” of the function/code as one thing and a more description about what it does in its own section. While I can see this as a burden to add, JSDOC shows https://jsdoc.app/tags-description being a type. Though it notes that the tag overrides the rest of the comment. The https://jsdoc.app/tags-summary tag seems to be the “short” description and/or summary of what the long stuff. Maybe switch this out for @summary ,,,, |
It sounds like what you want is provided by TypeDoc's The |
@Gerrit0 Remarks it is! 👍 |
Search Terms
description,since,block
Problem
Like
@since
(#2614),@description
is a valid JSdoc tag. When properly used in an IDE it shows up like this:From:
To:
... in the rendered view indicating more description/expanding from the "title." It might have been removed as the default by accident.
Suggested Solution
I am working on a PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: