Docs: update incremental by partition concepts #3688
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tobymao
reviewed
Jan 22, 2025
treysp
force-pushed
the
trey/concepts-inc-partition
branch
from
f791904 to
114e187
Compare
treysp
force-pushed
the
trey/concepts-inc-partition
branch
from
114e187 to
769db42
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds info box "should you use this model kind?" explaining table partitioning vs. loading by partition and that other model kinds are usually a better option.
Adds warning box that all restatements fully rebuild the table and should be done with caution.