-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#2116 Escaping unsafe pattern values of Regex
constructor derived from URL query parameter values containing special Regex
chars
#2150
Merged
ggnaegi
merged 7 commits into
ThreeMammals:develop
from
int0x81:bugfix/2116_regex_handling
Sep 20, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f2d773a
regex escape handling for url templates
int0x81 549aa56
refactored regex method to lamda version
int0x81 43c652b
Merge branch 'develop' into bugfix/2116_regex_handling
raman-m 32f16ec
Quick code review by @raman-m
raman-m 6dc998a
added acceptance test for url regex bug
int0x81 4848e11
moved acceptance test to routing tests
int0x81 0c150e5
Convert to theory: define 2 test cases
raman-m File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TODO Special chars in values of query strings
Hello @ggnaegi,
I would like to delay my approval until we have made a decision on the additional test case:
The third test has revealed issues within the middleware logic, indicating that this test case is likely to fail. The
MergeQueryStringsWithoutDuplicateValues
method struggles to handle URLs containing query strings with special characters, such asRegex
patterns and reserved URL specification characters. This issue became apparent in release 20.0.0 during the refactoring of theMergeQueryStringsWithoutDuplicateValues
method, which aimed to integrate existing and new logic (for example OData filters in query parameters, with bug fixes, with new feature for query string placeholders). Regrettably, the method fails to process special characters in parameter values.Would you recommend addressing the design bottleneck within this bug fix, or would creating a new TODO task be a better approach to ensure the current release proceeds without delay?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you don't mind I will submit a small code-review commit... → 0c150e5
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@raman-m the whole thing is a mess, @int0x81 who is new to ocelot said straight away that the implementation could be optimized. For now, I would suggest merging the current changes, refactorings are out of scope in my opinion. @int0x81 would be happy to create a follow up issue and PR.