-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extending Route configuration #651
Comments
@nurhat this isn't something I intend to change at the moment, however happy to accept a PR :) I will keep the issue open! |
@nurhat Congratulations! 🎉 |
@TomPallister commented on Oct 7, 2018:
It is accepted twice! 😉 |
@nurhat commented on Oct 3, 2018:
🆗 Imagine you have this property in some route. I see one possible user scenario, when you would like to create custom solution by custom concreate implementations of current interfaces, and add these concrete objects to DI-container and then reuse these concrete objects in your custom classes. But, I'm still curious... Could you show your user scenario? That will be very interesting challenge! 😉 |
Hey @nurhat ! |
Hi @guerinsylvain! |
Dear @nurhat,
Your feature request is somewhat unique, and in light of the ongoing PR #1183, we aim to accommodate it. |
New Feature
We need a way to access the custom properties defined for Routes when using Ocelot configuration merge option.
Motivation for New Feature
When having multiple ocelot configuration files and using Ocelot configuration merge option, custom configurations defined for Routes are lost in the merged ocelot.json.
Steps to Reproduce the Problem
AddOcelot
to merge configurations and create ocelot.json config fileSpecifications
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: