Add missing docs and upgrade dependencies

[sentenza]

Close #2

Close #9

Close #41

Tasks

• Update .gitignore
• Add Scalafmt
• Update travis conf
• Add CONTRIBUTING
• Update DIRECTORY listing all the missing algorithms taken from Java project Add more algorithms #2
• Fix README Change readme.md #9
• Updgrade sbt to v1.5.5 (latest)
• Upgrade scala to v2.13.6
• Fix several compiling error (after adding Xlint via tpolect plugin)

[sentenza]

@cclauss There's a wrong pipeline configured for LGTM analysis: JavaScript . We should get rid of it!

[sentenza]

@Panquesito7 follow up of our discussion on #9

[cclauss]

Also #59

Scala is not supported by LGTM https://lgtm.com/help/lgtm/about-lgtm#languages

[sentenza]

Also #59

Scala is not supported by LGTM https://lgtm.com/help/lgtm/about-lgtm#languages

@cclauss So we should remove LGTM from this project, shouldn't we?

[sentenza]

@Panquesito7 This GH workflow should be changed to be compatible with the new Directory scheme used by both Python and Java projects.

[Panquesito7]

@Panquesito7 This GH workflow should be changed to be compatible with the new Directory scheme used by both Python and Java projects.

Feel free to make a PR for that, and we'll review it. 🙂

[sentenza]

@Panquesito7 This GH workflow should be changed to be compatible with the new Directory scheme used by both Python and Java projects.

Feel free to make a PR for that, and we'll review it. 🙂

No idea how to fix that to be honest. I've never seen/used that plugin before. I don't even know where the configuration has been applied to enable it.

@Panquesito7 I applied your suggested change. ;)

[sentenza]

@Panquesito7 Could you please add the hacktoberfest tag to this PR?

[counter2015]

How about add scalafmtOnCompile := true in build.sbt ?

[sentenza]

How about add scalafmtOnCompile := true in build.sbt ?

@counter2015 I think it would make sense adding a new GitHub workflow for scalafmt on top of that. I'm going to add your suggested change. 👌

[cclauss]

@Panquesito7 @poyea Do you have access rights to do this?
https://lgtm.com/help/lgtm/managing-automated-code-review#disabling-pr-integration

[sentenza]

I guess that all the review comments were addressed and this PR could be merged in.

The LGTM thingy is not related to this PR.

@cclauss @Panquesito7 @counter2015 WDYT? 👂

[poyea]

@Panquesito7 @poyea Do you have access rights to do this? https://lgtm.com/help/lgtm/managing-automated-code-review#disabling-pr-integration

No. cc. @AnupKumarPanwar

[Panquesito7]

I've disabled the automated code review for now. Let's wait until Anup removes the LGTM integration from this repository. 🙂

[counter2015]

I guess that all the review comments were addressed and this PR could be merged in.

The LGTM thingy is not related to this PR.

@cclauss @Panquesito7 @counter2015 WDYT? 👂

LGTM, thanks for your work!

[sentenza]

@cclauss @Panquesito7 @counter2015 Can we merge this PR in? I would really love to keep working on other algorithms on top of the changes introduced here. I think that everyone here approved it already.

[cclauss]

I am not a Scala person and am not a maintainer of this repo.

[counter2015]

merged