Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

oopt-tai/inc:Add enum for modulation-format #166

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hongliMurphy
Copy link

@hongliMurphy hongliMurphy commented Feb 22, 2022

This is to add DP_16_QAM_PS in modulation-format, and also none to fec-type

@hongliMurphy
Copy link
Author

@ishidawataru -san, please check this pull request.

@ishidawataru
Copy link
Collaborator

@hongliMurphy Sorry for the delay. Could you add a comment on what PS stands for? Also, does it make sense to add probabilistic shaping variants for other modulation formats?

@hongliMurphy hongliMurphy force-pushed the feature/add_modulation_format_enum_for_PCS branch from 2e27899 to 3b0e679 Compare March 17, 2022 21:32
@hongliMurphy
Copy link
Author

@hongliMurphy Sorry for the delay. Could you add a comment on what PS stands for? Also, does it make sense to add probabilistic shaping variants for other modulation formats?

Ishida-san, updated with comment. I am checking with Catherine on which ones can have the PS variant.

@hongliMurphy hongliMurphy force-pushed the feature/add_modulation_format_enum_for_PCS branch from 3b0e679 to 3ed907e Compare March 21, 2022 17:04
@hongliMurphy hongliMurphy force-pushed the feature/add_modulation_format_enum_for_PCS branch from 3ed907e to 5ea1659 Compare March 22, 2022 20:27
@hongliMurphy
Copy link
Author

@ishidawataru san, I consulted with Catherine-san and FLA team, the probabilistic shaping is not applicable to lower level modulation-format. So I added PS for DP-32-QAM, and DP-64-QAM. Please check.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants