Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

namedlambda: name kwargs #40

Closed
Technologicat opened this issue Oct 10, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

namedlambda: name kwargs #40

Technologicat opened this issue Oct 10, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
@Technologicat
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone
0.14.2

Comments

@Technologicat
Copy link
Owner

Could add support for naming literal lambdas passed as named function arguments, since that's another binding construct.
@Technologicat Technologicat added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 10, 2019
@Technologicat Technologicat added this to the 0.14.x milestone Oct 10, 2019
@Technologicat Technologicat self-assigned this Oct 10, 2019
@Technologicat
Copy link
Owner Author

Issues cleanup: Low-hanging fruit? Let's try to have this in 0.14.2.

@Technologicat Technologicat modified the milestones: 0.14.x, 0.14.2 Feb 27, 2020
Technologicat added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2020
@Technologicat
namedlambda[]: name lambdas given as named function arguments
698cb82 
See #40.
@Technologicat
Copy link
Owner Author

First cut added in 698cb82.

Dictionary unpacking in calls not yet supported. Could extract names from the dictionary keys.

@Technologicat
Copy link
Owner Author

Maybe better not to support dictionary unpacking in calls, since the content of those dictionaries is only fully determined at run time.

Instead, in e0308a3, support added for lambdas dictionary literals with literal string keys.

Should be resolved now. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Technologicat Technologicat

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.14.2
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Technologicat