-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Python and Flask #269
Conversation
Avoids OOM Killer on small memory machine (< 2.0GB)
Hi, I took a look at your pull request - I am very interested to see how PyPy works. I did however notice that in the 'Fortunes' test you have not added the additional Fortune at request time as specified (requirement #5 here: http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=code). Would be good if you could add this too. Sean |
@seanaedmiston Is it fixed? |
Looks like it will do the job. One minor point. In my implementation of the 'raw' version, I found that it Cheers On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:44 PM, INADA Naoki [email protected]:
|
@seanaedmiston I've misunderstand what "Within the scope of the request, a new Fortune object must be constructed and added to the list." means. I've rollbacked 77dda2a. |
The intent of the addition of a new Fortune object during the scope of each request is:
Because of number 2 above, we strongly prefer the use of a Fortune class and instance objects even if you are not using an ORM. To my eye, using an array or tuple structure seems very aggressive optimization, making it atypical for a production application. Am I wrong there? |
@methane The fortunes test is failing because there's no template |
@pfalls1 Sorry, I've added it now. |
@bhauer |
@methane Looks great, thanks! |
hkp://
to get gpg key for environment in firewall.