-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 300
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
I think in most cases users should rely on `onlyHaveDependentClassesThat()` instead of `onlyBeAccessed().byClassesThat()`. The former covers all types of dependencies, also field types, annotations, type parameters, etc., while the latter only covers real accesses like field access or method call. Since this difference has often been confusing to users, we should lead them to the more restrictive one by default. Signed-off-by: Peter Gafert <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
1 parent
45c8e87
commit edf4b29
Showing
3 changed files
with
10 additions
and
10 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters