merge: Flutter Test completed by Daniel Esquivel #14
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This pull request contains the completed solution for Superformula's Flutter coding challenge.
Key Implementation Details
Architecture: I implemented Clean Architecture to ensure the solution is both scalable and maintainable, following the separation of concerns principles.
State Management: Riverpod was used as the state management solution, providing a reactive and flexible approach to handle application state.
Unit Tests: I wrote unit tests for widgets, providers, and data sources. The tests were supported by the mocktail package for efficient mocking, and I also used the network image mock package to test the image loading. In this PR, I ensure 87.3% test coverage.
Flutter.test.evidence.mov
3d42)