Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Fix or split to scan lose partition predicate (backport #53676) #53797

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Signed-off-by: Seaven <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 10eb85d)

# Conflicts:
#	fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/rule/transformation/SplitScanORToUnionRule.java
#	fe/fe-core/src/test/java/com/starrocks/sql/plan/SplitScanToUnionTest.java
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Cherry-pick of 10eb85d has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/branch-3.0/pr-53676
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/branch-3.0'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 10eb85d3c9.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	both modified:   fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/rule/transformation/SplitScanORToUnionRule.java
	both modified:   fe/fe-core/src/test/java/com/starrocks/sql/plan/SplitScanToUnionTest.java

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Dec 11, 2024

@mergify[bot]: Backport conflict, please reslove the conflict and resubmit the pr

@Seaven Seaven reopened this Dec 11, 2024
@wanpengfei-git wanpengfei-git enabled auto-merge (squash) December 11, 2024 02:46
@Seaven Seaven closed this Dec 11, 2024
auto-merge was automatically disabled December 11, 2024 02:59

Pull request was closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant