Refactor/ unify codebase naming #121
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
simon-the-shark
force-pushed
the
refactor/navigation-remake
branch
from
eece632 to
cfe9917
Compare
simon-the-shark
force-pushed
the
refactor/unify-names
branch
from
17d9534 to
c0f2d9a
Compare
simon-the-shark
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Re-pr of #119
Unified names refactor with simple guidelines and note in readme. You can take a quick look, but I wouldn't spend too much time looking into this, this should be semantically the same, just unified names. We can also obviously discuss some naming choices. Tell me what you think