-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 427
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Grants migration guide #2455
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4b2cab1
wip
sfc-gh-jcieslak 0814f19
add documentation
sfc-gh-jcieslak d528f5c
fix test
sfc-gh-jcieslak eea4092
migration + fix test
sfc-gh-jcieslak 1e422b2
changes after review
sfc-gh-jcieslak f45c1eb
changes after review
sfc-gh-jcieslak 9672d5a
Merge branch 'main' into grants-migration-guide
sfc-gh-jcieslak File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@ | ||
|
||
# Resource migration | ||
|
||
Here's a guide on how to migrate deprecated resources to their new counter-parts. | ||
The migration can be done in two ways. Either you can remove old grant resources and replace them with new ones or perform | ||
more complicated migration, but without revoking any grant (no downtime migration). We'll focus on the second one as the first approach | ||
is pretty straight forward. As an example we'll take `snowflake_database_grant` to `snowflake_grant_privileges_to_account_role` migration with one privilege granted to two roles: | ||
|
||
```terraform | ||
resource "snowflake_database_grant" "old_resource" { | ||
depends_on = [ snowflake_database.test, snowflake_role.a, snowflake_role.b ] | ||
database_name = snowflake_database.test.name | ||
privilege = "USAGE" | ||
roles = [ snowflake_role.a.name, snowflake_role.b.name ] | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
#### 1. terraform list | ||
|
||
First, we need to list all the grant resources that will need to be migrated. | ||
We can do that by running the `terraform state list` command. | ||
|
||
> **Tip:** for larger configurations, it's best to filter the results using the grep command. For example: `terraform state list | grep "snowflake_database_grant"`. | ||
|
||
#### 2. terraform rm | ||
|
||
Now choose which one you would to migrate next and remove it from the state, so when you remove the old resource, | ||
no grant will be revoked. More specifically, the Terraform Delete operation won't be run for removed resource. | ||
It will detach the resource block in your configuration from the actual Snowflake resource. | ||
You can remove resources from the state with the `terraform state rm <resource_address>` command. | ||
In our example, `terraform state rm snowflake_database_grant.old_resource`. After running the command, you can remove the resource from the configuration | ||
(again, removing the state will "detach" the resource block from the Snowflake resource. That's why after removing it, the Terraform won't try to revoke USAGE from our roles). | ||
|
||
#### 3. Two options from here | ||
|
||
At this point, we have several options for creating new grant resources that will replace the old ones. | ||
We will cover three options: | ||
- Configuration + Terraform CLI | ||
- Configuration + import block | ||
- Generating the configuration with import block and `terraform plan -generate-config-out` | ||
|
||
#### 3.1.1. Write a new grant resource that will be an equivalent of the older one | ||
|
||
```terraform | ||
resource "snowflake_grant_privileges_to_account_role" "new_resource" { | ||
depends_on = [snowflake_database.test, snowflake_role.a, snowflake_role.b] | ||
for_each = toset([snowflake_role.a.name, snowflake_role.b.name]) | ||
privileges = ["USAGE"] | ||
role_name = each.key | ||
on_account_object { | ||
object_type = "DATABASE" | ||
object_name = snowflake_database.test.name | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
#### 3.1.2. terraform import | ||
|
||
Write the `terraform import` command with the ID so that the resource will be able to parse and fill the state correctly. | ||
You can find import syntax in the documentation for a given resource, [here](https://registry.terraform.io/providers/Snowflake-Labs/snowflake/latest/docs/resources/grant_privileges_to_account_role#import) | ||
is the one for `snowflake_grant_privileges_to_account_role`. In our case, the command will look like this: | ||
```shell | ||
terraform import 'snowflake_grant_privileges_to_account_role.new_resource["role_a_name"]' 'role_a_name|USAGE|false|false|OnAccountObject|DATABASE|database_name' | ||
terraform import 'snowflake_grant_privileges_to_account_role.new_resource["role_b_name"]' 'role_b_name|USAGE|false|false|OnAccountObject|DATABASE|database_name' | ||
``` | ||
|
||
[Hashicorp documentation reference on import command](https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/cli/commands/import) | ||
|
||
#### 3.2.1 Write import block with new resource | ||
|
||
This is similar to the first approach, but here we don't have to worry about importing each `for_each` | ||
entry one by one. In the `locals` block, we're defining a map of resource name to ID. Then, we have | ||
to write a new resource similar to the first approach. In the end, we have to define an import block | ||
which will import defined IDs to a specified resource. | ||
|
||
```terraform | ||
locals { | ||
migrations = { | ||
"${snowflake_role.a.name}" = "\"${snowflake_role.a.name}\"|false|false|USAGE|OnAccountObject|DATABASE|\"${snowflake_database.test.name}\"" | ||
"${snowflake_role.b.name}" = "\"${snowflake_role.b.name}\"|false|false|USAGE|OnAccountObject|DATABASE|\"${snowflake_database.test.name}\"" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
resource "snowflake_grant_privileges_to_account_role" "new_resource" { | ||
depends_on = [snowflake_database.test, snowflake_role.a, snowflake_role.b] | ||
for_each = local.migrations | ||
privileges = ["USAGE"] | ||
account_role_name = "\"${each.key}\"" | ||
on_account_object { | ||
object_type = "DATABASE" | ||
object_name = "\"${snowflake_database.test.name}\"" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
import { | ||
to = snowflake_grant_privileges_to_account_role.new_resource[each.key] | ||
id = each.value | ||
for_each = local.migrations | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
[Hashicorp documentation reference on import block](https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/language/import) | ||
|
||
#### 3.2.2 Run terraform plan and apply | ||
|
||
After running `terraform plan` you'll see if resources can be imported without any change. If that's the case | ||
and nothing has to be adjusted, then we can perform `terraform apply` to import the state into our new grant resources. | ||
|
||
#### 3.3.1. Write import block | ||
|
||
Unfortunately, `for_each` cannot be used when generating with import blocks, so we have to define them one by one. | ||
For simplicity, we'll define just one import block (the second one would look the same, only with a different role). | ||
|
||
```terraform | ||
import { | ||
to = snowflake_grant_privileges_to_account_role.new_resource_role_a | ||
id = "\"${snowflake_role.a.name}\"|false|false|USAGE|OnAccountObject|DATABASE|\"${snowflake_database.test.name}\"" | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
[Hashicorp documentation reference on import block](https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/language/import) | ||
|
||
#### 3.3.2. terraform plan -generate-config-out | ||
|
||
After specifying the import block run the `terraform plan -generate-config-out=generated.tf` command, | ||
which will scan your configuration files search for import blocks, and put the generated configurations inside the `generated.tf` file. | ||
|
||
```terraform | ||
# __generated__ by Terraform | ||
# Please review these resources and move them into your main configuration files. | ||
|
||
# __generated__ by Terraform | ||
resource "snowflake_grant_privileges_to_account_role" "new_resource_role_a" { | ||
account_role_name = "\"test_role_321123123\"" | ||
all_privileges = false | ||
always_apply = false | ||
always_apply_trigger = null | ||
on_account = false | ||
privileges = ["USAGE"] | ||
with_grant_option = false | ||
on_account_object { | ||
object_name = "\"test_database_1231321\"" | ||
object_type = "DATABASE" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
#### 3.3.3. terraform plan and apply | ||
|
||
After running `terraform plan` you'll see if there are any changes we have to do before applying our generated configuration. | ||
If no errors are appearing you can run `terraform apply` to import state into generated configurations. | ||
|
||
#### 3.3.4. Limitations of Generating Configurations | ||
|
||
Config generation may be a good solution for a few reasons, but it also comes with limitations: | ||
- Manual review/fixing | ||
- Half of the values could be removed because they're the same as the default values | ||
- No `for_each` capabilities | ||
- You cannot specify `for_each` in the import block like in the second approach which promotes incremental migration | ||
- Generated configurations can't use `for_each` which results in much more configuration code | ||
- No resource reference | ||
- As you can see `account_role_name` and `object_name` are plain values, but the values most likely should be referenced by other resources' names. | ||
|
||
[Hashicorp documentation reference on limitations of generating configurations](https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/language/import/generating-configuration) |
9 changes: 5 additions & 4 deletions
9
pkg/resources/testdata/TestAcc_GrantPrivilegesToShare/OnDatabase/test.tf
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we link this in the dicussions? or from the discussions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, good idea. I'll put it as a comment in the grant discussion.