-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 345
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add rBoot partition support #2258
Merged
slaff
merged 21 commits into
SmingHub:develop
from
mikee47:feature/rboot-partition-support
Mar 17, 2021
Merged
Changes from 13 commits
Commits
Show all changes
21 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cc06b73
Fork rboot with sming branch, add partition table support
mikee47 0f29e8c
Fix OTA hardware profiles
mikee47 773c760
Update Basic_rBoot to show all ROMs, use same HW config Host build
mikee47 ca6b539
Improve Basic_rBoot ROM switching function
mikee47 f4ffdfd
Add `legacy` option, and separate partition for RF calibration
mikee47 9d1eecf
Add PartitionTable:: find(uint32_t) and findOta() methods
mikee47 7de4daf
OTA upgrade stream get size from partition table
mikee47 17e6b60
use std::unique_ptr for encryption buffer
mikee47 8be6408
Replace OtaUpgradeStream::errorToString() with toString() overload
mikee47 1a4a7c1
Add Partition overload method
mikee47 70d3818
Tidy up
mikee47 f46039c
Move `addItem` methods into header...
mikee47 a27f59e
Manage boot item list using `RbootHttpUpdater::ItemList`
mikee47 c1b1232
Review changes
mikee47 a78cdc4
Fix vscode workspace schema paths
mikee47 580dbd1
Get rid of 'legacy' options, just use those for defaults.
mikee47 5b6ae6b
Add `buildpart` target, add `part-clean` targets and run with `clean`
mikee47 dca2c2b
Add alternate option for Esp8266
mikee47 af73fe3
Remove redundant `flashinit` code
mikee47 3fb8e58
Update migration notes
mikee47 7ade434
Remove `spiffs-image-update` and `spiffs-image-clean` (now redundant)
mikee47 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mikee47 Why we need a new memory layout for ESP8266 given the fact that now the partition table can be moved to a different location? Why not keep the current layout and not introduce a legacy layout?