Models #7
Models #7
Conversation
Add new models
Format Python code with psf/black push
Sweep: PR Review.github/CODEOWNERSThe change adds .github/FUNDING.ymlThe change adds a GitHub sponsor handle to the funding configuration file. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.ymlA new bug report template has been added with fields for description, steps to reproduce, environment information, optional screenshots, relevant logs, and confirmations. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature-request.ymlA new feature request issue template has been added to the GitHub repository. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/question.ymlA new issue template for questions has been added, including fields for a detailed description and a checklist to ensure proper issue submission. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/sweep-template.ymlA new issue template for reporting small bugs, features, refactors, and tests to be handled by Sweep has been added. .github/dependabot.ymlThe pull request modifies the update schedule for GitHub Actions to daily and adds new daily update configurations for "pip" and "docker" with a "🤖 Dependencies" label. Sweep Found These Issues
serge-models/.github/dependabot.yml Lines 6 to 18 in 0db9488 View Diff .github/release-drafter.ymlThe changes add a comprehensive configuration for the Release Drafter GitHub Action, including templates, categories, version resolution, and auto-labeling rules. Sweep Found These Issues
serge-models/.github/release-drafter.yml Lines 30 to 35 in 0db9488 View Diff .github/workflows/black.ymlA new GitHub Actions workflow is added to automatically format Python code using the Black formatter and create a pull request if formatting changes are detected. .github/workflows/model-check.ymlAdded concurrency control to the GitHub Actions workflow to prevent multiple instances from running simultaneously. .github/workflows/ruff.ymlThe pull request adds a new GitHub Actions workflow to automate code linting with Ruff, ignoring F401 errors and automatically fixing issues. Sweep Found These Issues
https://github.com/Smartappli/serge-models/blob/0db948815bb17addd81ee0e07653283e0f76b5b5/.github%2Fworkflows%2Fruff.yml#L{Corresponding starting line number for Issue 1}-L{Corresponding ending line number for Issue 1} README.mdThe README.md file was updated to include new models in the "All" category of supported models. all/models.jsonThe pull request removes the "Asclepius" category and adds new categories "Gorilla," "LLaMA_3," "Meta-Llama-3," "OpenCodeInterpreter," and a new model to the "Wizard" category, expanding the dataset with additional models and their metadata. Sweep Found These Issues test.pyThe changes include adding a trailing comma to the |
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@Smartappli has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 57 minutes and 32 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent changes bring a wave of enhancements to the project's GitHub repository. New issue templates for bugs, features, and questions have been added, along with a template for AI-powered issue handling. GitHub funding details and code ownership were updated, while workflows for code formatting and linting were introduced. Model listings were revised, and a release drafter configuration was included. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (14)
- .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
- .github/FUNDING.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature-request.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/question.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/sweep-template.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/dependabot.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/release-drafter.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/black.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/model-check.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ruff.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- all/models.json (6 hunks)
- test.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- .github/CODEOWNERS
- .github/FUNDING.yml
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/question.yml
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/sweep-template.yml
- .github/dependabot.yml
- .github/workflows/black.yml
- .github/workflows/model-check.yml
- .github/workflows/ruff.yml
- test.py
Additional comments not posted (17)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature-request.yml (5)
1-4: LGTM! The metadata for the feature request template is clear and well-defined.
6-13: Well-structured notice section. It effectively guides users on where to ask questions and how to choose the correct template.
14-21: The feature description section is comprehensive and clearly requires detailed input, which is great for capturing essential details about the feature request.
22-28: The additional context section is optional and well-designed to capture any extra information that might be relevant to the feature request.
28-37: The checklist ensures that users have performed due diligence before submitting the feature request. It promotes quality and relevance in submissions..github/release-drafter.yml (6)
1-2: The version naming and tagging templates are set to use resolved version numbers, which should streamline the release process.
3-21: The categorization of changes is comprehensive, covering all necessary aspects like new features, bug fixes, and documentation updates. This should help in organizing the release notes effectively.
22-23: The change template and title escapes are well-configured to ensure clarity in the release notes.
24-43: Excluding bots like dependabot from contributors list and detailed version resolver settings are good practices to maintain clean and relevant release notes.
44-53: The release template is well-structured, providing placeholders for changes, Docker images, and a full changelog link. It also appreciates contributors, which is a nice touch.
55-72: The autolabeler settings are thoughtfully configured to automatically label pull requests based on the content, which should help in managing the project's workflow.README.md (1)
20-20: The addition of new models under the "All" category is well-documented. Ensure all newly listed models are correctly linked and accessible.Verification successful
The README.md file contains several markdown links, but none of them are related to the newly added models. Therefore, there are no broken links to verify for the newly listed models.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all newly listed models are correctly linked and accessible. # Test: Check for broken links in the README.md file. rg --type markdown $'\\[.*\\]\\(.*\\)' README.md | xargs -n 1 curl -o /dev/null --silent --head --failLength of output: 281
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all newly listed models are correctly linked and accessible. # Test: Check for broken links in the README.md file. rg --type markdown '\[.*\]\(.*\)' README.md | grep -oP '\(http.*?\)' | tr -d '()' | xargs -n 1 curl -o /dev/null --silent --head --failLength of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the README.md file contains any markdown links. # Search for markdown links in the README.md file. rg '\[.*\]\(.*\)' README.mdLength of output: 678
all/models.json (5)
351-398: Added new entity "Gorilla" with several models.This addition aligns with the PR's objective to update the model listings. The JSON structure is correctly maintained, and the disk space values are provided for each file, which is consistent with the rest of the entries.
493-528: Added new entity "LLaMA_3" with several models.The addition of "LLaMA_3" with detailed model configurations is consistent with the existing structure of the JSON file. Each model entry includes the necessary details such as repository and disk space, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity.
666-712: Added new entity "Meta-Llama-3" with several models.The new "Meta-Llama-3" entity has been added with multiple model configurations. The JSON entries are well-formed, and the disk space for each model is specified, ensuring consistency with the rest of the model entries.
920-977: Added new entity "OpenCodeInterpreter" with several models.The addition of the "OpenCodeInterpreter" entity with detailed model configurations is consistent with the existing structure of the JSON file. Each model entry includes the necessary details such as repository and disk space, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity.
1313-1321: Added new model "WizardLM-2-7B" under the "Wizard" entity.The addition of the "WizardLM-2-7B" model under the existing "Wizard" entity is correctly implemented. The JSON structure is maintained, and the disk space is specified, aligning with the format used throughout the document.
Update model-check.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/model-check.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/model-check.yml
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements
Documentation
Bug Fixes
Chores