Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Js/faster cache hash #38

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 17, 2018
Merged

Js/faster cache hash #38

merged 7 commits into from
Nov 17, 2018

Conversation

JimBobSquarePants
Copy link
Member

Prerequisites

  • I have written a descriptive pull-request title
  • I have verified that there are no overlapping pull-requests open
  • I have verified that I am following matches the existing coding patterns and practice as demonstrated in the repository. These follow strict Stylecop rules 👮.
  • I have provided test coverage for my change (where applicable)

Description

Optimization to half the memory usage and speed up the performance of the hashing algorithm.

@sebastienros
Copy link
Contributor

A reminder that I can run benchmarks for any branch, under load (lin/win and cloud/physical). I can give you the numbers for this one if you want. And I can also get you perfview traces if necessary.

@JimBobSquarePants
Copy link
Member Author

@sebastienros I meant to tag you when I pushed this actually. Thanks! That would be really great.

@JimBobSquarePants
Copy link
Member Author

@sebastienros Did you ever get the chance to benchmark this? I'd like to merge it in so we can release an updated version for consumption.

@sebastienros
Copy link
Contributor

Should do it tomorrow

@JimBobSquarePants
Copy link
Member Author

I'm gonna merge this, we can benchmark later. Super confident it's faster anyway.

@JimBobSquarePants JimBobSquarePants merged commit 8da968c into master Nov 17, 2018
@JimBobSquarePants JimBobSquarePants deleted the js/faster-cache-hash branch November 21, 2018 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants