You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now we have nothing to solve them. On the other hand, there are also not many of them. Should we ignore them, or should we try to solve multiple kinds of questions using a tool designed for common bonds, in order to make the work more worthwhile?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
True that. I believe since there are only 0.2% of common bond questions, we
can bypass them for the time being. In the mean I will work on the
spreading activation algorithm to come up with a working model.
On Jan 24, 2015 2:25 PM, "Sean Gallagher" [email protected] wrote:
Right now we have nothing to solve them. On the other hand, there are also
not many of them. Should we ignore them, or should we try to solve multiple
kinds of questions using a tool designed for common bonds, in order to make
the work more worthwhile?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #81.
Right now we have nothing to solve them. On the other hand, there are also not many of them. Should we ignore them, or should we try to solve multiple kinds of questions using a tool designed for common bonds, in order to make the work more worthwhile?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: