Feature: Custom Lint Files

[NickLiffen]

As a developer, I would like to append custom rules to this action, so I can run specific actions that are only applicable to the company I work for.

In a perfect work, I would be able to specify the repository, ref (branch) and path 💯

[NickLiffen]

@ScottBrenner 👋 How open would you be to a slight restructuring of the architecture of this application? Right now it's all in oneDockerfile`, I can see us expanding outside to use something like this.

It would mean we could add some unit tests and also have some more luxury with the GitHub Octokit Library. E.G in this issue, I can reference other repositories outside the scope of the action it runs in.

I am happy to do the work, but understand you are the maintainer so would like your thoughts.

Personally, everything in the Dockerfile somewhat limits us a bit with the potential of this action. However, your thoughts would be great 👍

[NickLiffen]

Again, I would be happy to do the work, or we could collaborate together 💯

The cloud formation linter has great config options, and I think we could honour that better with the JS Option over native Dockerfile. Thanks. Happy to chat about it in this issue if you like.

[ScottBrenner]

Let's do it! I've no experience developing in JavaScript unfortunately so I wouldn't be able to assist much, but I'm certainly open to it.

[NickLiffen]

Thanks @ScottBrenner 💯 Could you assign me write access, please? It's easier to test in this repo, you can protect the master branch and assign reviews to make sure you review before anything goes in 👍 If that's okay, would be a little easier then forking? Thanks 👍

[ScottBrenner]

Sure, but what's the advantage of working in this repository over a fork? not familiar myself

[NickLiffen]

Sory @ScottBrenner I am just getting to this 👍 I am ready to raise a pull request if you are good to review 👍 ?

[ScottBrenner]

Sure! 👍🏻

[NickLiffen]

@ScottBrenner pull request raised 👍 would love your feedback 🌷