Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Newton Raphson used to ignore jac-prototype #200

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 19, 2023

Conversation

avik-pal
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

@ai-maintainer ai-maintainer bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI-Maintainer Review for PR - Newton Raphson used to ignore jac-prototype

Title and Description ⚠️

Title is clear but description is missing
The title of the pull request provides a concise summary of the changes. However, the description is missing. It would be beneficial to include a brief explanation in the description that provides more context and clarifies the motivation behind the changes. This would help reviewers and future maintainers understand the purpose of the modifications without having to dive into the code diff.

Scope of Changes 👍

Changes are narrowly focused
The changes are narrowly focused on a specific issue. The modifications are concentrated in the `src/raphson.jl` file and primarily involve the handling of the `jac-prototype` in the Newton Raphson algorithm. There are no changes in other files or unrelated areas of the codebase. This focused approach is good as it suggests that the author is addressing a specific problem or improving a specific aspect of the code, rather than trying to resolve multiple issues simultaneously.

Testing ⚠️

No information about testing provided
The description of the pull request does not provide any information about how the author tested the changes. It would be helpful for the author to include details about the testing methodology they employed to ensure the correctness and effectiveness of the modifications. This could include information about unit tests, integration tests, or any other relevant testing procedures that were conducted.

Suggested Changes

Please provide a description for the pull request that explains the motivation behind these changes and how you tested them. This will help reviewers understand the context and the level of confidence in the changes.

Also, consider adding comments in the code where the jac_prototype is being handled differently. This will help future maintainers understand the logic behind this change.

Reviewed with AI Maintainer

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 18, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #200 (503d579) into master (cb80ed2) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #200      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.73%   93.75%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         718      720       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          673      675       +2     
  Misses         45       45              
Files Changed Coverage Δ
src/raphson.jl 97.61% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Needs a test

@avik-pal
Copy link
Member Author

There was already a test, but it never tested that the jac_prototype was being used 😓. Updated that to check that the prototype is being mutated.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit e93fc58 into SciML:master Aug 19, 2023
@avik-pal avik-pal deleted the ap/jac_prototype branch August 21, 2023 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants