-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updating docs and tutorials for ITP #198
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #198 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.73% 93.73%
=======================================
Files 7 7
Lines 718 718
=======================================
Hits 673 673
Misses 45 45
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
added itp def
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AI-Maintainer Review for PR - Updating docs and tutorials for ITP
👍 Title and Description
The title is clear and concise, but the description is missing
The title of the pull request effectively communicates the purpose of the changes, which is to update the documentation and tutorials for the ITP method. However, the description of the pull request is missing. It would be beneficial for the author to provide a detailed description outlining the specific updates made to the documentation and tutorials.
👍 Scope of Changes
The changes are narrowly focused
The changes in the pull request are narrowly focused on updating the documentation and tutorials for the ITP method. There are no other changes or modifications in the diff that suggest the author is trying to resolve multiple issues simultaneously.
❓ Testing
Information about testing is missing
The description of the pull request does not provide any information about how the author tested the changes. It would be beneficial for the author to include details about the testing process they followed to ensure the correctness and effectiveness of the updates made to the documentation and tutorials.
👍 Documentation
All existing methods are well-documented
Based on the provided diff, there are no newly added functions, classes, or methods. Therefore, there are no docstrings that need to be added.
Recommended Changes
Please provide a detailed description of the changes made in the pull request, outlining the specific updates made to the documentation and tutorials. Also, include details about the testing process you followed to ensure the correctness and effectiveness of the updates made to the documentation and tutorials.
Reviewed with AI Maintainer
@ChrisRackauckas we can merge this |
No description provided.