Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use undefmatrix to init jacobian #104

Merged

Conversation

oscardssmith
Copy link
Contributor

This will save a small amount of work.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #104 (4115605) into master (abec47c) will decrease coverage by 17.44%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 4115605 differs from pull request most recent head 6bc1bd0. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6bc1bd0 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #104       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   77.22%   59.77%   -17.45%     
===========================================
  Files           5        5               
  Lines         180      179        -1     
===========================================
- Hits          139      107       -32     
- Misses         41       72       +31     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/raphson.jl 87.50% <100.00%> (-3.27%) ⬇️
src/ad.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
src/utils.jl 42.00% <0.00%> (-10.00%) ⬇️
src/jacobian.jl 71.05% <0.00%> (-5.27%) ⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas force-pushed the use-undef-matrix-to-init-jacobian branch from 4115605 to 6bc1bd0 Compare December 2, 2022 15:21
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 903b483 into SciML:master Dec 2, 2022
@oscardssmith oscardssmith deleted the use-undef-matrix-to-init-jacobian branch December 2, 2022 16:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants