Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Failed to precompile #136

Closed
ValentinKaisermayer opened this issue Jan 24, 2023 · 16 comments
Closed

Failed to precompile #136

ValentinKaisermayer opened this issue Jan 24, 2023 · 16 comments

Comments

@ValentinKaisermayer
Copy link

Since yesterday:

ERROR: LoadError: Failed to precompile NonlinearSolve [8913a72c-1f9b-4ce2-8d82-65094dcecaec] to /....
(@v1.8) pkg> st
Status `/usr/share/julia/environments/v1.8/Project.toml`
  [a2441757] Coverage v1.6.0
  [8913a72c] NonlinearSolve v1.2.0
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

What's the rest of the information for reproducing it?

@ValentinKaisermayer
Copy link
Author 

julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 1.8.1
Commit afb6c60d69a (2022-09-06 15:09 UTC)
Platform Info:
  OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
  CPU: 4 × Common KVM processor
  WORD_SIZE: 64
  LIBM: libopenlibm
  LLVM: libLLVM-13.0.1 (ORCJIT, nocona)
  Threads: 1 on 4 virtual cores

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

What about on 1.8.5? What's the error message?

@ValentinKaisermayer
Copy link
Author 

julia> import NonlinearSolve
[ Info: Precompiling NonlinearSolve [8913a72c-1f9b-4ce2-8d82-65094dcecaec]
ERROR: Failed to precompile NonlinearSolve [8913a72c-1f9b-4ce2-8d82-65094dcecaec] to /usr/share/julia/compiled/v1.8/NonlinearSolve/jl_SNb1wF.
Stacktrace:
 [1] error(s::String)
   @ Base ./error.jl:35
 [2] compilecache(pkg::Base.PkgId, path::String, internal_stderr::IO, internal_stdout::IO, keep_loaded_modules::Bool)
   @ Base ./loading.jl:1705
 [3] compilecache
   @ ./loading.jl:1649 [inlined]
 [4] _require(pkg::Base.PkgId)
   @ Base ./loading.jl:1337
 [5] _require_prelocked(uuidkey::Base.PkgId)
   @ Base ./loading.jl:1200
 [6] macro expansion
   @ ./loading.jl:1180 [inlined]
 [7] macro expansion
   @ ./lock.jl:223 [inlined]
 [8] require(into::Module, mod::Symbol)
   @ Base ./loading.jl:1144

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

On 1.8.5?

@ValentinKaisermayer
Copy link
Author

Sry, I don't have that installed right now.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Can you try it? As a patch release it has bugfixes to Base and the compiler.

@svretina
Copy link

I had a similar issue but without an error since it would close the terminal completely when I tried to precompile NonlinearSolve. Installing and precompiling with julia-1.8.5 solved the issue for me.

@ranocha
Copy link
Member

ranocha commented Jan 24, 2023 •
edited
Loading

It also happens with Julia v1.7.3 (the latest release of v1.7, which we use for CI with Trixi.jl):

julia> using Pkg; Pkg.activate(temp=true); Pkg.add("NonlinearSolve"); Pkg.precompile()
  Activating new project at `/tmp/jl_jbRKDZ`
    Updating registry at `~/.julia/registries/General.toml`
   Resolving package versions...
    Updating `/tmp/jl_jbRKDZ/Project.toml`
  [8913a72c] + NonlinearSolve v1.2.0
[...]
Precompiling project...
  ✗ NonlinearSolve
  23 dependencies successfully precompiled in 85 seconds (92 already precompiled)
  1 dependency errored. To see a full report either run `import Pkg; Pkg.precompile()` or load the package
Precompiling project...
  ✗ NonlinearSolve
  0 dependencies successfully precompiled in 31 seconds (115 already precompiled)

ERROR: The following 1 direct dependency failed to precompile:

NonlinearSolve [8913a72c-1f9b-4ce2-8d82-65094dcecaec]

Failed to precompile NonlinearSolve [8913a72c-1f9b-4ce2-8d82-65094dcecaec] to ~/.julia/compiled/v1.7/NonlinearSolve/jl_O7Z7W1.
Stacktrace:
 [1] pkgerror(msg::String)
   @ Pkg.Types ~/Software/julia-1.7.3/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/Pkg/src/Types.jl:68
 [2] precompile(ctx::Pkg.Types.Context; internal_call::Bool, strict::Bool, warn_loaded::Bool, already_instantiated::Bool, kwargs::Base.Pairs{Symbol, Union{}, Tuple{}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}})
   @ Pkg.API ~/Software/julia-1.7.3/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/Pkg/src/API.jl:1362
 [3] precompile
   @ ~/Software/julia-1.7.3/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/Pkg/src/API.jl:1013 [inlined]
 [4] #precompile#220
   @ ~/Software/julia-1.7.3/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/Pkg/src/API.jl:1011 [inlined]
 [5] precompile()
   @ Pkg.API ~/Software/julia-1.7.3/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/Pkg/src/API.jl:1011
 [6] top-level scope
   @ REPL[1]:1

@ranocha ranocha mentioned this issue Jan 24, 2023
Merged
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Interesting, it doesn't give an error message? What happens if you using NonlinearSolve?

It sounds like it's something that was fixed in later versions of Julia so I'll have to boot up v1.7.3 to reproduce. But that has a big startup time on my current laptop and I'm currently at a hackathon (and as described in https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-1-9-beta3-is-much-slower-for-first-time-users/93429/24 this laptop is not for programming haha) so if someone could post the error message I can try a few things.

Or if someone could just try removing something from the snoop precompilation and see if that fixes it that could be good.

@ranocha
Copy link
Member

ranocha commented Jan 24, 2023

Continuing the post above with the output on Julia v1.7.3:

Failed to precompile NonlinearSolve [8913a72c-1f9b-4ce2-8d82-65094dcecaec] to ~/.julia/compiled/v1.7/NonlinearSolve/jl_TvjAdN.
Stacktrace:
 [1] pkgerror(msg::String)
   @ Pkg.Types ~/Software/julia-1.7.3/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/Pkg/src/Types.jl:68
 [2] precompile(ctx::Pkg.Types.Context; internal_call::Bool, strict::Bool, warn_loaded::Bool, already_instantiated::Bool, kwargs::Base.Pairs{Symbol, Union{}, Tuple{}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}})
   @ Pkg.API ~/Software/julia-1.7.3/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/Pkg/src/API.jl:1362
 [3] precompile
   @ ~/Software/julia-1.7.3/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/Pkg/src/API.jl:1013 [inlined]
 [4] #precompile#220
   @ ~/Software/julia-1.7.3/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/Pkg/src/API.jl:1011 [inlined]
 [5] precompile()
   @ Pkg.API ~/Software/julia-1.7.3/share/julia/stdlib/v1.7/Pkg/src/API.jl:1011
 [6] top-level scope
   @ REPL[1]:1

julia> using NonlinearSolve
[ Info: Precompiling NonlinearSolve [8913a72c-1f9b-4ce2-8d82-65094dcecaec]
ERROR: Failed to precompile NonlinearSolve [8913a72c-1f9b-4ce2-8d82-65094dcecaec] to ~/.julia/compiled/v1.7/NonlinearSolve/jl_mVZo9L.
Stacktrace:
 [1] error(s::String)
   @ Base ./error.jl:33
 [2] compilecache(pkg::Base.PkgId, path::String, internal_stderr::IO, internal_stdout::IO, ignore_loaded_modules::Bool)
   @ Base ./loading.jl:1466
 [3] compilecache(pkg::Base.PkgId, path::String)
   @ Base ./loading.jl:1410
 [4] _require(pkg::Base.PkgId)
   @ Base ./loading.jl:1120
 [5] require(uuidkey::Base.PkgId)
   @ Base ./loading.jl:1013
 [6] require(into::Module, mod::Symbol)
   @ Base ./loading.jl:997

It comes with a huge increase of RAM usage - so much that it starts swapping, slows down everything considerably, and nearly runs out of space...

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Try removing TrustRegion from precompilation. Something seems bugged with its precompilation with Float32 (that's being fixed in the other PR)

@ranocha
Copy link
Member

ranocha commented Jan 24, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Seems to be fixed already on master (commit e1c35f5) - at least for Julia v1.7.3.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Okay that makes sense, no wonder I was having trouble reproducing. If someone could just do this last step (#132 (comment)) then we should tag all of the Float32 type fixes.

@sloede
Copy link

sloede commented Jan 25, 2023

It comes with a huge increase of RAM usage - so much that it starts swapping, slows down everything considerably, and nearly runs out of space...

We see something that could be OOM errors on GH Actions Windows machines, which would be consistent with your observation.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

This should be fixed with the v1.3.0 release

avik-pal pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2024
@ChrisRackauckas
Merge pull request #136 from SciML/ap/nlls_term
3915d61 
Use the different norms for termination
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@ChrisRackauckas @sloede @ranocha @svretina @ValentinKaisermayer