Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

correct SavingCallback docs #191

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2019
Merged

correct SavingCallback docs #191

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2019

Conversation

dkarrasch
Copy link
Contributor

@dkarrasch dkarrasch commented Jan 31, 2019

Fixes SciML/DiffEqCallbacks.jl#56

Regarding the numerical values, I let the code run and copied the results.

EDIT: I'm such an idiot! 🤣 I overlooked that the initial condition was random, and thought it's fixed. Anyway, the numerical values are not supposed to be reproducible, so either ones should be fine.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 8a6af7e into SciML:master Feb 2, 2019
@dkarrasch dkarrasch deleted the patch-1 branch February 2, 2019 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SavingCallback broken?
2 participants