-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fleet commander: store deskprofiles under user running SSSD #7119
Conversation
c64d6c3
to
df49404
Compare
Fails at F40 are unrelated. |
But do users actively use it? I've never used Fleet Commander, is there someone willing to test this PR does not break their working setup? |
Depends on definition of "actively" but in general "I don't think so".
About 1st patch: I think @stanislavlevin said they use something similar in ALT Linux and this works for them (at least it was my understanding from #5888 (comment)) About 2nd patch: this, of course, does break working config - it will require to set
|
Comments from @abbra about changing defaults:
|
Ok, I removed "default changed to 'none'" part from the 2nd patch and created #7123 to implement run time detection. |
For the sake of completeness, "non-privileged" runs are in #7120. But I don't think it matters much because I don't think tests hit those codepaths. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ack, thank you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As we talked on slack, the second patch is not needed. The target constructor is only run if the provider is ipa.
Integrated feature was never oficially released, but the latest development status was: ``` org.freedesktop.FleetCommanderClient is run as root ``` and can read profiles doesn't matter files ownership ( https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/IG3MIET5MILWJZRS3JQWMTVOPGNY6XWI/ ) Actual status is that 'FleetCommanderClient' isn't really maintained. Storing profiles under user that runs SSSD doesn't break anything but removes the need for CAP_SET_?ID and CAP_CHOWN (in this code). Resolves: SSSD#4659
Removed 2nd patch |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi,
sorry for miss-reading the patch, I have no further comments, ACK.
bye,
Sumit
Integrated feature was never oficially released, but the latest development status was:
and can read profiles doesn't matter files ownership ( https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/IG3MIET5MILWJZRS3JQWMTVOPGNY6XWI/ )
Actual status is that 'FleetCommanderClient' isn't really maintained.
Storing profiles under user that runs SSSD doesn't break anything but removes the need for CAP_SET_?ID and CAP_CHOWN (in this code).