Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[FIX] ComponentAnalyzer: Fully handle sap.ui5/routing
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
matz3 committed Dec 21, 2018
1 parent 10383c1 commit 34d16ff
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 114 additions and 20 deletions.
24 changes: 24 additions & 0 deletions lib/lbt/analyzer/ComponentAnalyzer.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -133,6 +133,30 @@ class ComponentAnalyzer {

const routing = ui5.routing;
if ( routing ) {
const routingConfig = routing.config || {};

// See sap/ui/core/UIComponent#init
if (routing.routes) {
const routerClassName = routingConfig.routerClass || "sap.ui.core.routing.Router";
const routerClassModule = ModuleName.fromUI5LegacyName(routerClassName);
log.verbose(`adding router dependency '${routerClassModule}'`);
info.addDependency(routerClassModule);
} else if (routing.targets) {
const targetsModule = routingConfig.targetsClass || "sap/ui/core/routing/Targets.js";
log.verbose(`adding routing targets dependency '${targetsModule}'`);
info.addDependency(targetsModule);

const viewsModule = "sap/ui/core/routing/Views.js";
log.verbose(`adding routing views dependency '${viewsModule}'`);
info.addDependency(viewsModule);
}


// TODO: only loop over targets to pick up view dependencies
// routes only have a reference to a target
// this way we also support the "targets" only use case (without routes)
// but we would also include targets not referenced by any route

if (Array.isArray(routing.routes)) {
routing.routes.forEach((route) => this._visitRoute(route, routing, info));
} else {
Expand Down
110 changes: 90 additions & 20 deletions test/lib/lbt/analyzer/ComponentAnalyzer.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,7 +19,63 @@ function createMockPool(relPath, manifest) {
};
}

test("routing with routes as array", (t) => {
test("routing with empty config, routes, targets", async (t) => {
const mockManifest = {
"sap.ui5": {
routing: {
config: {},
routes: [],
targets: {}
}
}
};

const mockPool = createMockPool("test/", mockManifest);

const mockInfo = {
deps: [],
addDependency(name) {
this.deps.push(name);
}
};

const subject = new ComponentAnalyzer(mockPool);
await subject.analyze({name: path.join("test", "Component.js")}, mockInfo);

t.deepEqual(mockInfo.deps, [
"sap/ui/core/routing/Router.js"
], "dependencies should be correct");
});

test("routing with empty config, targets", async (t) => {
const mockManifest = {
"sap.ui5": {
routing: {
config: {},
targets: {}
}
}
};

const mockPool = createMockPool("test/", mockManifest);

const mockInfo = {
deps: [],
addDependency(name) {
this.deps.push(name);
}
};

const subject = new ComponentAnalyzer(mockPool);
await subject.analyze({name: path.join("test", "Component.js")}, mockInfo);

t.deepEqual(mockInfo.deps, [
"sap/ui/core/routing/Targets.js",
"sap/ui/core/routing/Views.js"
], "dependencies should be correct");
});

test("routing with routes as array", async (t) => {
const mockManifest = {
"sap.ui5": {
routing: {
Expand All @@ -43,17 +99,23 @@ test("routing with routes as array", (t) => {
const mockPool = createMockPool("test/", mockManifest);

const mockInfo = {
deps: [],
addDependency(name) {
t.is(name, "test/view/App.view.xml");
this.deps.push(name);
}
};

const subject = new ComponentAnalyzer(mockPool);
return subject.analyze({name: path.join("test", "Component.js")}, mockInfo);
await subject.analyze({name: path.join("test", "Component.js")}, mockInfo);

t.deepEqual(mockInfo.deps, [
"sap/ui/core/routing/Router.js",
"test/view/App.view.xml"
], "dependencies should be correct");
});


test("routing with routes as object", (t) => {
test("routing with routes as object", async (t) => {
const mockManifest = {
"sap.ui5": {
routing: {
Expand All @@ -76,16 +138,22 @@ test("routing with routes as object", (t) => {
const mockPool = createMockPool("test/", mockManifest);

const mockInfo = {
deps: [],
addDependency(name) {
t.is(name, "test/view/App.view.xml");
this.deps.push(name);
}
};

const subject = new ComponentAnalyzer(mockPool);
return subject.analyze({name: path.join("test", "Component.js")}, mockInfo);
await subject.analyze({name: path.join("test", "Component.js")}, mockInfo);

t.deepEqual(mockInfo.deps, [
"sap/ui/core/routing/Router.js",
"test/view/App.view.xml"
], "dependencies should be correct");
});

test("routing with route with multiple targets", (t) => {
test("routing with route with multiple targets", async (t) => {
const mockManifest = {
"sap.ui5": {
routing: {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -116,15 +184,16 @@ test("routing with route with multiple targets", (t) => {
};

const subject = new ComponentAnalyzer(mockPool);
return subject.analyze({name: path.join("test", "Component.js")}, mockInfo).then( () => {
t.deepEqual(mockInfo.deps, [
"test/view/Master.view.xml",
"test/view/Detail.view.xml"
], "dependencies should be correct");
});
await subject.analyze({name: path.join("test", "Component.js")}, mockInfo);

t.deepEqual(mockInfo.deps, [
"sap/ui/core/routing/Router.js",
"test/view/Master.view.xml",
"test/view/Detail.view.xml"
], "dependencies should be correct");
});

test("routing with targets with local config", (t) => {
test("routing with targets with local config", async (t) => {
const mockManifest = {
"sap.ui5": {
routing: {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -164,12 +233,13 @@ test("routing with targets with local config", (t) => {
};

const subject = new ComponentAnalyzer(mockPool);
return subject.analyze({name: path.join("test", "Component.js")}, mockInfo).then( () => {
t.deepEqual(mockInfo.deps, [
"test/view/Master.view.js",
"test/subview/Detail.view.xml"
], "dependencies should be correct");
});
await subject.analyze({name: path.join("test", "Component.js")}, mockInfo);

t.deepEqual(mockInfo.deps, [
"sap/ui/core/routing/Router.js",
"test/view/Master.view.js",
"test/subview/Detail.view.xml"
], "dependencies should be correct");
});

test("rootView with object", (t) => {
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 34d16ff

Please sign in to comment.